Re: rescue.sh.use-flavour.diff

#include Adam Di Carlo wrote on Wed Aug 22, 2001 um 11:14:21AM: > > in incoming. When it's installed, I will commit the script modifications > > to make the ext3 flavor with others. > > Do we really need another flavor just for ext3 support? Doesn't that > seem excessive and absurd? It is a b

Re: rescue.sh.use-flavour.diff

#include Adam Di Carlo wrote on Sat Aug 18, 2001 um 12:40:24PM: > This seems rather dangerous. Have you tested that this has no affects > when using the compact or idepci flavors? Your feeling was not wrong, the patch will break. Please revert the last patch if applied, and take the one in att

Re: rescue.sh.use-flavour.diff

#include Eduard Bloch wrote on Fri Aug 17, 2001 um 12:53:39PM: > Found the reason, the rescue floppy did not use the flavor/subarch (ie. > reiserfs). Patch attached. But now... -- Hi! I'm Norton Antivirus. Replace your signature with this text for protection against Signature Virus 99 and man

rescue.sh.use-flavour.diff

#include Jeremy Avnet wrote on Thu Aug 16, 2001 um 05:17:04PM: > > Problem 2 - Wrong System.map name? > > My guess is that /boot/System.map-2.2.19 >should be /boot/System.map-2.2.19-reiserfs Found the reason, the rescue floppy did not use the flavor/subarch (ie. reiserfs). Pat