On Friday 07 July 2006 00:01, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 22 June 2006 22:29, Frans Pop wrote:
> > I will post a more detailed release plan as soon as it is clear when
> > the 2.6.16 kernel packages will migrate to testing. Some information
> > about Beta 3 is already available from [1].
>
> As
Quoting Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> There is some activity to resolve the issues around 2.6.16, but there is
> also a real chance that the migration will not happen and that we will
> have to cancel Beta 3.
Does this mean that Etch would be released with 2.6.15?
Or cancelling Beta3 is mo
On Thursday 22 June 2006 22:29, Frans Pop wrote:
> I will post a more detailed release plan as soon as it is clear when
> the 2.6.16 kernel packages will migrate to testing. Some information
> about Beta 3 is already available from [1].
As this has not yet happened, there is no real progress on th
On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 03:11:11PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> I've submitted what I hope will be the final debian-installer build to the
> autobuilders, but it seems that recent dependency breakage in newt will
> cause some of the builds to fail. I hope I can ask the autobuilders to
> retry, but thi
I've submitted what I hope will be the final debian-installer build to the
autobuilders, but it seems that recent dependency breakage in newt will
cause some of the builds to fail. I hope I can ask the autobuilders to
retry, but this will likely delay things for a few days.
At this point it's prob
I just upgraded to discover 2.0.4-3 with discover-data 2.2004.04.09-1
and it seems that the problem is fixed.
Bye,
Giuseppe
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Il dom, 2004-04-25 alle 00:13, Petter Reinholdtsen ha scritto:
> [Giuseppe Sacco]
> > A second problem I understand only now is that the powerpc discover
> > we have in testing now is broken: every time I switch on my laptop
> > (powerbook g4, 15", 867Mhz) it hangs when discover run and probe for
>
Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
> I would like to have powerpc release only after having
> kernel-image-2.4.25-powerpc-* version 2.4.25-8 in testing
> because of #245012.
If I'm expanding yuor wildcard correctly, they seem to go in
tonight/tomorrow. Anyway, you have several days to get them in, but this
doe
[Giuseppe Sacco]
> A second problem I understand only now is that the powerpc discover
> we have in testing now is broken: every time I switch on my laptop
> (powerbook g4, 15", 867Mhz) it hangs when discover run and probe for
> parallel port devices. This means that I have to press the keyboard
>
Il gio, 2004-04-22 alle 18:55, Joey Hess ha scritto:
[...]
> - powerpc: need list of working subarches (oldworld?)
I would like to have powerpc release only after having
kernel-image-2.4.25-powerpc-* version 2.4.25-8 in testing
because of #245012.
A second problem I understand only now is
On Sat, Apr 24, 2004 at 12:16:44PM -0500, elijah wright wrote:
> > > - both the de4x5 and the tulip drivers fail to work with many
> > > DECChip-based ethernet cards in the 2.4.2x series alpha kernels;
> > > bug #228654.
> > Both of these sound like reasonable candidates for errata if they're
On Sat, Apr 24, 2004 at 12:54:18PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> > - qlogicisp driver doesn't work right with many (most?) SCSI cards;
> > bug #238593 et al.
> > - both the de4x5 and the tulip drivers fail to work with many
> > DECChip-based ethernet cards in the 2.4.2x seri
> > - both the de4x5 and the tulip drivers fail to work with many
> > DECChip-based ethernet cards in the 2.4.2x series alpha kernels;
> > bug #228654.
> Both of these sound like reasonable candidates for errata if they're not
> fixed, and not release blockers. Do you want them in the errata
Steve Langasek wrote:
> - qlogicisp driver doesn't work right with many (most?) SCSI cards;
> bug #238593 et al.
> - both the de4x5 and the tulip drivers fail to work with many
> DECChip-based ethernet cards in the 2.4.2x series alpha kernels;
> bug #228654.
Both of these sound like reasonab
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 12:55:06PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> - alpha: still SCSI cd problems?
> Please let me know of any other issues or corrections.
Other major issues on alpha, both apparently kernel related:
- qlogicisp driver doesn't work right with many (most?) SCSI cards;
bug #
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 12:55:06PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> I'm trying to track status of various architectures at the top of TODO,
> here is what I have so far.
> - ia64: There is a devpts/sysvinit/glibc file conflict of some
> sort that breaks debootstrap. Need a bug #.
* Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-22 22:15]:
> Argh, not again. libdebian-installer 0.22 went into the archive today
> with some fixes for subarch handling, in particular #243692. Was that
> version on your image?
I tried it with 0.22 now and still see the same... it's quite strange.
Just f
* Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-23 16:32]:
> Does archdetect show the correct output for netwinder?
Yes.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * tbm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-23 01:43]:
> > > - arm: ?
> >
> > arm/netwinder most definitely works. It worked recently and there is
>
> It works; the only problem I had was that the wrong kernel was
> installed. For some reason, debian-installer/kernel/su
* tbm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-23 01:43]:
> > - arm: ?
>
> arm/netwinder most definitely works. It worked recently and there is
It works; the only problem I had was that the wrong kernel was
installed. For some reason, debian-installer/kernel/subarchitecture
was not set. Unfortunat
* Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-22 22:15]:
> > was loaded since it has a different sub-architecture (however, iirc,
> > delo-installer is also loaded on Cobalt, so I assume sub-arch handling
> > is broken).
>
> Argh, not again. libdebian-installer 0.22 went into the archive today
> with s
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> I just did a successful installation on a DECstation 5000/133 via the
> serial console. Everything worked fine, apart from one thing: both
> colo-installer and delo-installer got loaded, and colo-installer was
> executed instead of delo-installer. I have no idea why colo
* Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-22 12:55]:
> I'm trying to track status of various architectures at the top of TODO,
> here is what I have so far.
>
> - arm: ?
arm/netwinder most definitely works. It worked recently and there is
afaict nothing that broke it in the meantime. arm
* Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-22 12:55]:
> - mipsel: looks good
I just did a successful installation on a DECstation 5000/133 via the
serial console. Everything worked fine, apart from one thing: both
colo-installer and delo-installer got loaded, and colo-installer was
executed
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 12:55:06PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> - m68k: need list of working subarches
mac and amiga are fully supported.
I hope to have support for the rest in the next couple of weeks or so,
but if they aren't ready for release, so be it.
--
Stephen R. Marenka If lif
Today's the last day of the string freeze, leaving this left in the timeline
for release:
23 aprilupload translated udebs to archive
23 aprilwrite release announcement
24 aprillast possible changes to udebs on initrds
25 aprilinitrd builds
26 aprilinitrd bui
> - lowmem package must enter archive
> - Check archive for udebs that need to be built on various arches;
>make sure everything is up-to-date. Also, make sure that eg,
>appropriate kernel debs have entered the archive on each
>architecture.
one thing I noticed with a recent daily bu
Sven Luther wrote:
> chrp, chrp-rs6k and prep will be working this time around, i think
> everything is there, but i need to fiddle the build system for it still
> to build the initrd images, but i do this already by hand, and
> everything is in place for it. This would use the powerpc netboot
> in
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 10:29:28PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
[...]
> The string freeze has not quite started, since a few strings were
> changed today. Hopefully we've seen the last of that
I also just rewrote most of the strings for the cdebconf text frontend.
They should certainly be reviewed by a
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 10:29:28PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > 3. at least one successful installation report per boot method
>
> I have not had time to track installation reports. Could someone take
> a pass through the list of recent reports and post a summary to the list
> please? My vague imp
I wrote:
> We're still on track for release on the 15th. Here's a schedule up to
> then:
>
> March 3rd No changes to libraries past this point.
> March 6th Final code changes for i386 enter the archive.
> (except new udebs and possibly partman)
> March 7th A
31 matches
Mail list logo
