On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 04:09:48PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Colin Watson (cjwat...@debian.org):
> > No objection on principle, but "No ... have been mounted automatically"
> > doesn't read quite right to me: it sounds a bit like "we have this
> > automation that has cleverly mounte
Quoting Colin Watson (cjwat...@debian.org):
> No objection on principle, but "No ... have been mounted automatically"
> doesn't read quite right to me: it sounds a bit like "we have this
> automation that has cleverly mounted no file systems, since that would
> have been hard for you to do manuall
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 12:10:44PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl):
>
> > > Could we use this opportunity to drop this "for you". It doesn't add
> > > much information and I always find this quite clumky. I don't really
> > > see why a given action would be
Quoting Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl):
> > Could we use this opportunity to drop this "for you". It doesn't add
> > much information and I always find this quite clumky. I don't really
> > see why a given action would be made "for me".
> >
> > "No file systems have been mounted automatically." wou
On Monday 16 February 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Colin Watson (cjwat...@alioth.debian.org):
> > + No file systems have been mounted for you.
>
> Could we use this opportunity to drop this "for you". It doesn't add
> much information and I always find this quite clumky. I don't really
Quoting Colin Watson (cjwat...@alioth.debian.org):
> _Description: Executing a shell
> After this message, you will be given a shell in the installer environment.
> - Since the installer could not find any partitions, no file systems have
> - been mounted for you.
> + No file systems have been
6 matches
Mail list logo
