Re: preseeding vs lvm

2012-01-16 Thread Patryk Ściborek
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Philip Hands wrote: > On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 10:49:07 +0100, Ferenc Wagner wrote: >> Patryk Ściborek writes: >> >> > But to my surprise it creates much bigger PV than I want: >> > [...] >> > And LV root takes all available space: >> >> Last time I checked it was imp

Re: preseeding vs lvm

2012-01-16 Thread Philip Hands
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 10:49:07 +0100, Ferenc Wagner wrote: > Patryk Ściborek writes: > > > But to my surprise it creates much bigger PV than I want: > > [...] > > And LV root takes all available space: > > Last time I checked it was impossible to preseed an LVM setup where not > all the space was

Re: preseeding vs lvm

2012-01-16 Thread Ferenc Wagner
Patryk Ściborek writes: > But to my surprise it creates much bigger PV than I want: > [...] > And LV root takes all available space: Last time I checked it was impossible to preseed an LVM setup where not all the space was allocated. I had to resort to custom scripts invoked by custom partman m

preseeding vs lvm

2012-01-15 Thread Patryk Ściborek
Hi! I'm trying to install Sqeeze on some servers booting them with PXE and preseeding d-i. Unfortunately I can't force partman to do what I want. I'd like to have something like this: /dev/cciss/c1d0p1 - 2G for /boot /dev/cciss/c1d0p2 - 50G as PV for VG servervg /dev/cciss/c1d0p3 - rest of the d