Re: potato release notes missing

2000-08-20 Thread James A. Treacy
On Fri, Aug 18, 2000 at 11:16:37PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Fri, Aug 18, 2000 at 04:27:14PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > > I disagree, it's useful, having directories without index.html is bad. > > > > I deny it is actually useful. All of its information is more > > completely and clear

Re: potato release notes missing

2000-08-18 Thread Josip Rodin
On Fri, Aug 18, 2000 at 04:27:14PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > I disagree, it's useful, having directories without index.html is bad. > > I deny it is actually useful. All of its information is more > completely and clearly stated at > http://www.debian.org/releases/potato/index.*.html. Tha

Re: potato release notes missing

2000-08-18 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I disagree, it's useful, having directories without index.html is bad. I deny it is actually useful. All of its information is more completely and clearly stated at http://www.debian.org/releases/potato/index.*.html. Inaccurate and incomplete informati

Re: potato release notes missing

2000-08-17 Thread Josip Rodin
On Wed, Aug 16, 2000 at 11:44:34PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Actually, no, this is not in webwml, because the file is built differently > > for different architectures, and it'd be a bit harder to maintain if it was > > in wml. > > You don't unde

Re: potato release notes missing

2000-08-16 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Actually, no, this is not in webwml, because the file is built differently > for different architectures, and it'd be a bit harder to maintain if it was > in wml. You don't understand. I know its processed by m4. But on www.debian.org/releases/potato,

Re: potato release notes missing

2000-08-16 Thread Josip Rodin
Sorry for the slow reply, I was on vacation. :) On Mon, Aug 14, 2000 at 05:44:09PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > > For boot-floppies/documentation people: I'm not sure how to set up m4 to > > > make two different links, depending on what kind of install is done. If it's > > > a web build, the

Re: potato release notes missing

2000-08-14 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, Jul 29, 2000 at 12:47:15PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > > For boot-floppies/documentation people: I'm not sure how to set up m4 to > > make two different links, depending on what kind of install is done. If it's > > a web build, the link should poin

Re: potato release notes missing

2000-07-29 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sat, Jul 29, 2000 at 12:47:15PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > > /debian/dists/potato/main/disks-i386/2.2.16-2000-07-14/doc/release-notes.en.html > > > > (that file is referenced from > > /debian/dists/potato/main/disks-i386/2.2.16-2000-07-14/doc/ ) > > I know. It's partially fixed in CVS alread

Re: potato release notes missing

2000-07-29 Thread Josip Rodin
On Fri, Jul 28, 2000 at 11:10:16PM -0300, Cesar Eduardo Barros wrote: > The file > > /debian/dists/potato/main/disks-i386/2.2.16-2000-07-14/doc/release-notes.en.html > > Is missing from both mirrors I tested (saens and one of http.us). aj on irc told > me to email you. > > (that file is referen