On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 09:57:44AM -0800, Matt Kraai wrote:
> Package: kernel-patch-2.4.22-powerpc
>
> On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 10:40:44AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Anyway, i cannot really test this stuff, since the 2.4.22-4 kernel
> > doesn't provide support for my Radeon 9200, i will have to
Package: kernel-patch-2.4.22-powerpc
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 10:40:44AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> Anyway, i cannot really test this stuff, since the 2.4.22-4 kernel
> doesn't provide support for my Radeon 9200, i will have to make another
> upload, but this will have to wait for next year, and p
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 12:05:06PM +0100, Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
> Il mer, 2003-12-31 alle 10:40, Sven Luther ha scritto:
> > On Sat, Dec 27, 2003 at 10:21:16AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> [...]
> > Anyway, as a result i cannot commit the small fix i promised you
> > yesterday, so someone else will ha
Il mer, 2003-12-31 alle 10:40, Sven Luther ha scritto:
> On Sat, Dec 27, 2003 at 10:21:16AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
[...]
> Anyway, as a result i cannot commit the small fix i promised you
> yesterday, so someone else will have to do it. Here it is :
[... KERNEL_FLAVOUR patch ...]
Hi Sven,
yester
On Sat, Dec 27, 2003 at 10:21:16AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> powerpc: Very shakey
> - Daily building is down; Thorsten Sauter needs a build machine
> and bruckner is down, voltaire is not set up right. Needs a
> debian admin or a kindly offer from someone with a powerpc
>
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 05:29:58PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> alpha: ???
> Used to be one of the better supported arches, but it doesn't look
> like anyone's worked on it since October?
Where d-i work is concerned, alpha is my next priority. My first
priority is getting a set of working
Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Joey Hess wrote (with lots snipped out by me):
> > i386: On track for beta 2
> > powerpc: Very shakey
> > ia64: Likely to be in beta 2
> > mips: May be in beta 2
> > arm: Uncertian
> The buildds are still down for ARM. And apparently it doesn't have
> d-i kernels yet.
Joey Hess wrote (with lots snipped out by me):
i386: On track for beta 2
powerpc: Very shakey
ia64: Likely to be in beta 2
mips: May be in beta 2
arm: Uncertian
The buildds are still down for ARM. And apparently it doesn't have
d-i kernels yet. Ow. Is this even likely to be released with
Thorsten Sauter wrote:
> of course, I can do this. I will try the demo this weekend. And I know,
> that the installer itself works good on my hppa machine.
If you wait until this weekend, there's a good chance it will miss beta
2. FWIW.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signatur
* Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-29 20:36]:
| Thorsten Sauter wrote:
| > there is currently no daily build. I have started it, but now pear.d.o
| > is not recovered/opened for me. So that's the same like powerpc...
| > waiting.
| >
| > I have created a cdrom-set, so I thing daily cdrom's s
On Sat, Dec 27, 2003 at 08:27:45PM +0100, Thorsten Sauter wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> * Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-27 16:21]:
> | powerpc: Very shakey
> | - Daily building is down; Thorsten Sauter needs a build machine
> | and bruckner is down, voltaire is not set up right. Needs
Thorsten Sauter wrote:
> there is currently no daily build. I have started it, but now pear.d.o
> is not recovered/opened for me. So that's the same like powerpc...
> waiting.
>
> I have created a cdrom-set, so I thing daily cdrom's should easily
> creatable by manty.
Would you like to try to get
* Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-28 19:45]:
| Thorsten Sauter wrote:
| > hppa: ?
| > I like to see beta builds for hppa too. If no one is able to build
| > such images, I can create the beta cdrom for hppa.
| > The hppa looks in a very good state for me, no we _should_ provide
| > i
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-28 21:09]:
> > > Yes. I have an Indigo2 and an Origin 200 ready to go, just waiting
> > > for interesting things to netboot.
> >
> > The O 200 wants IIRC a 64bit kernel, so it is yet unsupported by
> > debian.
>
> There are so
* Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-28 21:09]:
> > Yes. I have an Indigo2 and an Origin 200 ready to go, just waiting
> > for interesting things to netboot.
>
> The O 200 wants IIRC a 64bit kernel, so it is yet unsupported by
> debian.
There are some people who'd like to see the Origin 2
Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
> Yes, I checked the archive two hours ago, but I still cannot make the
> cd-image.
>
> LANG=C fakeroot make TYPE=cdrom image
>
> gives me this error, probably because of a wrong ${kernel:Version}
>
> E: Package kernel-image-2.4.22-powerpc-udeb has no installation
> candida
Il lun, 2003-12-29 alle 03:51, Joey Hess ha scritto:
> Joey Hess wrote:
> > Unfortunatly, linux-kernel-di only built the -small flavour kernel image
> > last time. I have corrected this and the full set of udebs should go
> > into the archive as soon as I can get ahold of a ftp master (may be a
> >
Joey Hess wrote:
> Unfortunatly, linux-kernel-di only built the -small flavour kernel image
> last time. I have corrected this and the full set of udebs should go
> into the archive as soon as I can get ahold of a ftp master (may be a
> few days). If you would like them in the meantime, they're all
Maitland Bottoms wrote:
> X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under Emacs 21.2.1
> FCC: ~/mail/archived
> X-Face: #_Z/6E$=iDx1F]P+Ihzq7A.ptGp'9^{lq:).f}z;/C~
> TS*Y?KNb=~^*%0FWY>#8tyl]O')dv!Y:s~a#BK?fuo;~J8u,S>HZ&|o9gi~'<@woChY;)>#|">)vr+
> 9Zd,@,)F[7)5O!Ry2>BJC% --text follows this line--
Is that the face of a c
X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under Emacs 21.2.1
FCC: ~/mail/archived
X-Face: #_Z/6E$=iDx1F]P+Ihzq7A.ptGp'9^{lq:).f}z;/C~
TS*Y?KNb=~^*%0FWY>#8tyl]O')dv!Y:s~a#BK?fuo;~J8u,S>HZ&|o9gi~'<@woChY;)>#|">)vr+
9Zd,@,)F[7)5O!Ry2>BJC%> mips: May be in beta 2
>
>Including it in beta 2 will surely help the install repor
Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
> So I started working on this powerpc machine. When I try to build d-i I
> am blocked because of the kernel package. The command I type, in the
> build directory, is
>
> LANG=C fakeroot make TYPE=cdrom image
>
> and the errors I get are:
>
> 1. kernel-image-2.4.22-powerpc-
Thorsten Sauter wrote:
> hppa: ?
> I like to see beta builds for hppa too. If no one is able to build
> such images, I can create the beta cdrom for hppa.
> The hppa looks in a very good state for me, no we _should_ provide
> image also.
It would be useful if you could work with manty and
Joey Hess wrote:
> This is my impression of the status of the d-i ports for the beta. It
> may be wildly skewed, but it's my impression right now:
[snip]
> mips: May be in beta 2
> - I think it almost works, but there may be a final big peice or
> two. No recent install reports, but
Il sab, 2003-12-27 alle 20:29, Thorsten Sauter ha scritto:
> * Giuseppe Sacco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-27 16:56]:
> | > powerpc: Very shakey
> | > - Daily building is down; Thorsten Sauter needs a build machine
> | > and bruckner is down, voltaire is not set up right. Needs a
> | > d
Il sab, 2003-12-27 alle 20:29, Thorsten Sauter ha scritto:
> * Giuseppe Sacco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-27 16:56]:
[...]
> | I have a powerpc machine that is almost always connected to Internet,
> | if someone need to access it, just drop me an email.
>
> what does this mean? shell access on th
* Giuseppe Sacco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-27 16:56]:
| > powerpc: Very shakey
| > - Daily building is down; Thorsten Sauter needs a build machine
| > and bruckner is down, voltaire is not set up right. Needs a
| > debian admin or a kindly offer from someone with a powerpc
| >
Hello,
* Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-27 16:21]:
| powerpc: Very shakey
| - Daily building is down; Thorsten Sauter needs a build machine
| and bruckner is down, voltaire is not set up right. Needs a
| debian admin or a kindly offer from someone with a powerpc
|
> powerpc: Very shakey
> - Daily building is down; Thorsten Sauter needs a build machine
> and bruckner is down, voltaire is not set up right. Needs a
> debian admin or a kindly offer from someone with a powerpc
> box.
> - Autobuilding ok.
> - Kernels are
This is my impression of the status of the d-i ports for the beta. It
may be wildly skewed, but it's my impression right now:
i386: On track for beta 2
- Several recent install reports, it seems to be working well,
barring the problems I am tracking in doc/TODO.
- New ma
29 matches
Mail list logo
