Processing control commands:
> reassign 833270 lxde-core
Bug #833270 [task-lxde-desktop] LXDE: poor text wrapping for Wastebasket icon
in default install
Bug reassigned from package 'task-lxde-desktop' to 'lxde-core'.
No longer marked as found in versions tasksel/3.31+
enshot, no
>dependency
>Control: severity -2 normal
>Control: retitle -3 LXDE: poor text wrapping for Wastebasket icon in default
>install
>Control: severity -3 minor
>
>I've just installed an LXDE desktop via task-lxde-desktop/the LXDE d-i
>jessie LXDE spin CD1 with no netw
Alex Gaynor (2016-06-21):
> Package: debootstrap
> Severity: normal
> thanks
>
> If debootstrap is invoked like so: `sudo debootstrap jessie jessie
> --include=openssh-server` it errors out with `/usr/sbin/debootstrap: 314:
> set: Illegal option --`. The correct invocation is to move teh `--inclu
Package: debootstrap
Severity: normal
thanks
If debootstrap is invoked like so: `sudo debootstrap jessie jessie
--include=openssh-server` it errors out with `/usr/sbin/debootstrap: 314:
set: Illegal option --`. The correct invocation is to move teh `--include`
before `jessi`, but it'd be nice if a
Your message dated Tue, 22 Mar 2011 14:44:56 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#617580: fixed in console-setup 1.71
has caused the Debian Bug report #617580,
regarding console-setup: Poor documentation for configuring the keyboard
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
On Thu Mar 10 15:12:16 2011, an...@lml.bas.bg wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 01:18:38PM +0100, J?rgen Grahn wrote:
> >
> > (BTW, my immediate problem was to get my own keymap in X11. I solved
> > it by bringing in my old Lenny xorg.conf and disabling the three
> > xorg.conf settings which cau
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 01:18:38PM +0100, Jцrgen Grahn wrote:
>
> (BTW, my immediate problem was to get my own keymap in X11. I solved
> it by bringing in my old Lenny xorg.conf and disabling the three
> xorg.conf settings which cause the keyboard settings there to be ignored.
My point was to
On Wed Mar 9 22:41:39 2011, an...@lml.bas.bg wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 09:15:50PM +0100, Jorgen Grahn wrote:
> >
> > I've just upgraded to Squeeze, trying to find a way to bring back my
> > old heavily customized X11 keymap. I think I can state my problem in
> > the cleanest way by descr
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 09:15:50PM +0100, Jorgen Grahn wrote:
>
> I've just upgraded to Squeeze, trying to find a way to bring back my
> old heavily customized X11 keymap. I think I can state my problem in
> the cleanest way by describing how I did my search:
>
> [...]
Thank you for the valuabl
Package: console-setup
Version: 1.68
Severity: normal
I've just upgraded to Squeeze, trying to find a way to bring back my
old heavily customized X11 keymap. I think I can state my problem in
the cleanest way by describing how I did my search:
- First I notice there is no xorg.conf. That's OK
Your message dated Sat, 04 Sep 2010 05:32:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#589579: fixed in base-installer 1.110
has caused the Debian Bug report #589579,
regarding debian-installer: i386 kernel flavour selection is poor
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 589579 base-installer
Bug #589579 [base-installer] debian-installer: i386 kernel flavour selection is
poor
Ignoring request to reassign bug #589579 to the same package
> tags 589579 pending
Bug #589579 [base-installer] debian-ins
reassign 589579 base-installer
tags 589579 pending
thanks
Quoting Ben Hutchings (b...@decadent.org.uk):
> Please apply this patch.
>
> I've just raised the severity to 'important'; I think problem 1 is
> serious enough to justify that.
>
> Ben.
Applied
signature.asc
Description: Digital sig
Please apply this patch.
I've just raised the severity to 'important'; I think problem 1 is
serious enough to justify that.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Sunday 18 July 2010, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-07-18 at 23:11 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > On Sunday 18 July 2010, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > + if grep -q '^flags.*\blm\b' "$CPUINFO"; then
> >
> > Has this been tested with busybox shell?
> > Does busybox' grep understand '\b'? I d
On Sun, 2010-07-18 at 23:11 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Sunday 18 July 2010, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > + if grep -q '^flags.*\blm\b' "$CPUINFO"; then
>
> Has this been tested with busybox shell?
> Does busybox' grep understand '\b'? I don't recall us using it anywhere
> else in D-I.
This w
On Sun, 2010-07-18 at 23:08 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Sunday 18 July 2010, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > 3. The 686 flavour is considered unsuitable for some AMD K7 processors
> >
> > Problem 3 appears to be due to a workaround for an incorrect kernel
> > configuration. The comment on this exclusion
On Sunday 18 July 2010, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> + if grep -q '^flags.*\blm\b' "$CPUINFO"; then
Has this been tested with busybox shell?
Does busybox' grep understand '\b'? I don't recall us using it anywhere
else in D-I.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
wit
On Sunday 18 July 2010, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> 3. The 686 flavour is considered unsuitable for some AMD K7 processors
>
> Problem 3 appears to be due to a workaround for an incorrect kernel
> configuration. The comment on this exclusion is 'May not have SSE
> support', but this has never been a re
Package: debian-installer
Tags: squeeze patch
There are several problems with the current selection:
1. 686-bigmem is not preferred when there is RAM above 4GB
2. 686-bigmem is not always offered where it is usable, and amd64 is
never offered
3. The 686 flavour is considered unsuitable for some AM
Quoting Dr. Craig ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
>
> Dear Debian team,
> Out of all the many choices for installing the many different
> Linux operating systems out here on the internet why is it that Debian is not
> the preferred choice outside academics? I think you know! Because it takes an
> academic
Dear Debian team,
Out of all the many choices for installing the many different
Linux operating systems out here on the internet why is it that Debian is not
the preferred choice outside academics? I think you know! Because it takes an
academic in Computer science to install the system the way yo
Your message dated Sat, 24 May 2008 23:53:26 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#481514: Poor mouse configuration with debian-installer
has caused the Debian Bug report #481514,
regarding Poor mouse configuration with debian-installer
to be marked as done.
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: CD-ROM
Image version: etch 4.0r1
Date: May 3, 2008
Machine: Dell Inspiron 4400
Processor: Intel Pentium 4
Memory: 512M
Partitions: 4 (1 Windows NTFS, 1 Linux swap, 1 root
(/), 1 home (/home))
Output of lspci -nn and lspci -vnn: N/A
Base System Installa
Hi folks,
My Debian installation saga continues. I've just tried my fourth
different method. My hardware is:
Gigabyte GA-7N400Pro m/b (nForce2 chipset)
Athlon XP 2400+
512 Mb DDR RAM
Silicon Image SI3112 onboard SATA, 2 x WD 200 Gb drives (target)
ITE IT8212F onboard ATA RAID, 2 x Seagate 80 Gb
The only muctbltiple
orgrngasm supplement for men!
Have amazing sepdpx up to 20
times per day.
Prevent preuevmature
ejacmnjulation.
Maintain harder, stronger erejoctions for hours.
Multiple orgahevrms with NO
eresrction loss.
100% Safe To Take, With NO Side Effects
Fast Priority USPS Shipping
26 matches
Mail list logo
