On Sun, Dec 07, 2003 at 06:17:41PM +0100, Thomas Poindessous wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 09:11:43PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
> > Hi Joey and everyone, thanks for the cc. I'm willing to maintain
> > discover in maintainance mode, but if Progeny plans to focus on
> > discover2, I don't really
Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 11:27:40PM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
> > > Thanks to all of us. I just downloaded this tarball, and will
> > > provide per language tarballs with PO files in few hours.
> > As CVS is working again for the debian-installer, there is
> > no
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 11:47:43PM +0100, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
[...]
> Could someone tell me what do I have to do to get back r/w access to CVS
> repositories? I hope it won't be impossible task after that luckless
> compromise :/
You certainly already read this message after posting:
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 11:27:40PM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
> > Thanks to all of us. I just downloaded this tarball, and will
> > provide per language tarballs with PO files in few hours.
> As CVS is working again for the debian-installer, there is
> no more need for such tarballs.
Could someo
On Sun, Dec 07, 2003 at 04:24:17PM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
[...]
> Thanks to all of us. I just downloaded this tarball, and will
> provide per language tarballs with PO files in few hours.
As CVS is working again for the debian-installer, there is
no more need for such tarballs. My cronjob i
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 12:08:02AM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> We are aware of that and did some tests with it. I tried to build the
> state of the repository as it was on the day the public access was
> announced, but it failed. After a quick glance over the build system I
> noticed, that it
Am Mon, den 08.12.2003 schrieb David Nusinow um 00:12:
> On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 12:00:06AM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> > David Nusinow was interested in it. If he still wants to take it I'm
> > fine with that. I'm not particularly interested in maintaining a package
> > that will be obsoleted
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> > IMO if we want to release sarge with discover2 for d-i we have to
> > release beta2 with discover2 (after that it's too late for this
> > change!)
>
> I agree with Joey, we should try to have everything ready just after
> beta2 is released.
One caveat: If someone is
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 12:00:06AM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> David Nusinow was interested in it. If he still wants to take it I'm
> fine with that. I'm not particularly interested in maintaining a package
> that will be obsoleted soon, but if nobody is interested in it I will
> take it.
I'
Am Son, den 07.12.2003 schrieb Doug Porter um 19:00:
> Gaudenz Steinlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > One consequence of this is that we need discover2 udebs ASAP.
>
> If you guys haven't noticed, there are bits in the Subversion
> repository for building a udeb. I've successfully built a u
Am Son, den 07.12.2003 schrieb Petter Reinholdtsen um 19:45:
> [Gaudenz Steinlin] wrote:
> > There apparently was some discussion between branden robinson and me
> > which did not get through to the list or at least the list archive
> > due to the break in. Branden proposed the following transition
On Sun, 7 Dec 2003 18:17:41 +0100, Thomas Poindessous wrote:
> as I explained in the bts, the recent change in glibc and
> linux-kernel-headers has changed the way to handle inclusion of kernel
> headers.
>
> userland application ( like discover ) must copy headers they are using,
> they must not
[Gaudenz Steinlin] wrote:
> There apparently was some discussion between branden robinson and me
> which did not get through to the list or at least the list archive
> due to the break in. Branden proposed the following transition:
Hm, wish I had found this email earlier today. Then I would have
Gaudenz Steinlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> One consequence of this is that we need discover2 udebs ASAP.
If you guys haven't noticed, there are bits in the Subversion
repository for building a udeb. I've successfully built a udeb
with it just now, but I have no idea if the resultant udeb is
Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> Well, here's what I'd personally like: :)
>
> 1) Get a good feedback cycle going between Progeny and debian-boot
>regarding discover2's suitability for debian-installer. The goal
>here is "feature-complete", not "bug-free".
> 2) Hand off maintenance off Discover
On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 09:11:43PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 11:24:56AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Christian Perrier wrote:
>
> Hi Joey and everyone, thanks for the cc. I'm willing to maintain
> discover in maintainance mode, but if Progeny plans to focus on
> discover
On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 09:11:43PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 11:24:56AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Christian Perrier wrote:
>
> Hi Joey and everyone, thanks for the cc. I'm willing to maintain
> discover in maintainance mode, but if Progeny plans to focus on
> discover
There apparently was some discussion between branden robinson and me
which did not get through to the list or at least the list archive due
to the break in. Branden proposed the following transition:
---
Well, here's what I'd personally like: :)
1) Get a good feedback cycle going between Proge
On Sun, Dec 07, 2003 at 03:23:39PM +0100, Pierre Machard wrote:
> > Does someone has a recent CVS snapshot? We could then provide PO files
> > to translators.
>
> According to stat, my lastest snapshot was Wed Nov 19 18:56:13 2003.
Seems that I've got more recent snapshot.
2003-11-21 00:00:36.000
On Sun, Dec 07, 2003 at 04:10:54PM +0100, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 07, 2003 at 03:23:39PM +0100, Pierre Machard wrote:
> > > Does someone has a recent CVS snapshot? We could then provide PO files
> > > to translators.
> >
> > According to stat, my lastest snapshot was Wed Nov
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 09:10:05PM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 10:57:13PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> [...]
> > If you're interested in adding a new language to d-i in time for the
> > next beta, you should start translation now, or have already started, as
> > the one week
On Sun, Dec 07, 2003 at 08:46:58PM +1100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> When reading Thomas fix, I had this feeling, yes.
>
> However, the point is to remove this FTBFS bug from discover1 so that
> it can be part of the sarge release.
Definitely. This and the /cdrom mount bug.
> Thomas fix may be ca
Looks like David Nusinow's mail server doesn't like mine :
This is the Postfix program at host kheops.homeunix.org.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that the message returned
below could not be delivered to one or more destinations.
For further assistance, please send mail to
If you do so, ple
Quoting David Nusinow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Hi Joey and everyone, thanks for the cc. I'm willing to maintain
> discover in maintainance mode, but if Progeny plans to focus on
> discover2, I don't really see the point in keeping discover1 alive
> beyond the sarge release. The fix from Thomas Poind
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 11:24:56AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Christian Perrier wrote:
> > Critical work to do: discover (221302, FTBFS found while trying to NMU, I'm
> > unable to correct this alone and I can't upload anymore due to GPG key
> > compromission)
>
> There is a patch in the bts from T
Il gio, 2003-12-04 alle 04:57, Joey Hess ha scritto:
> I'm currently planning to start the debian-installer string freeze one
> week after both CVS and Incoming are available again, and let the string
> freeze last for only one week. I had been hoping for two weeks, but the
> recent compromise has
Christian Perrier wrote:
> Critical work to do: discover (221302, FTBFS found while trying to NMU, I'm
> unable to correct this alone and I can't upload anymore due to GPG key
> compromission)
There is a patch in the bts from Thomas Poindessous for that build
failure. If you can send me your patch
Quoting Denis Barbier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> I meant the latter, and I do not have a full up-to-date checkout.
I have a checkout from 11/18 at 18h55 GMT.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I think that the debconf template polishing effort is nearly complete,
Status as of 11/19, including 2nd stage packages
Critical work to do: discover (221302, FTBFS found while trying to NMU, I'm
unable to correct this alone and I can't upload anymore due
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 04:47:06PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Denis Barbier wrote:
[...]
> > Does someone has a recent CVS snapshot? We could then provide PO files
> > to translators.
>
> Not sure if you mean a cvs repo snapshot (don't have one yet), or a cvs
> tree (I'm sure we all have one).
I
Denis Barbier wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 10:57:13PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> [...]
> > If you're interested in adding a new language to d-i in time for the
> > next beta, you should start translation now, or have already started, as
> > the one week string freeze will likely not be enough ti
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 10:57:13PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
[...]
> If you're interested in adding a new language to d-i in time for the
> next beta, you should start translation now, or have already started, as
> the one week string freeze will likely not be enough time for a full
> translation fro
I'm currently planning to start the debian-installer string freeze one
week after both CVS and Incoming are available again, and let the string
freeze last for only one week. I had been hoping for two weeks, but the
recent compromise has us behind schedule, and having CVS down due to
that may have
33 matches
Mail list logo
