On Fri, September 15, 2006 4:45, Frans Pop said:
> I'd suggest just uploading at standard prio. We can always keep the udeb
> in unstable if any serious issues are found.
Good :)
> Talking about priorities, have the priorities of other crypto udebs been
> adjusted already for the "only load when
On Tuesday 05 September 2006 01:22, Max Vozeler wrote:
> What I think needs to be solved before a first upload:
>
> 1. Priority. The package currently has standard priority,
> which gets it loaded by default installs. I'm not sure given
> the closeness to rc1 and would prefer input about this
On Tue, September 5, 2006 9:35, David Härdeman said:
> On Tue, September 5, 2006 1:22, Max Vozeler said:
>>
>> 2. Dependencies. I think they need to be tightened a bit
Done
>> 3. Yet a bit more code could perhaps be dropped, I think :-)
Done
>> 4. debian/copyright still mentions substanti
On Tue, September 5, 2006 1:22, Max Vozeler said:
> What I think needs to be solved before a first upload:
>...
> 2. Dependencies. I think they need to be tightened a bit
Will do
> 3. Yet a bit more code could perhaps be dropped, I think :-)
I'll take a look at it
> 4. debian/copyright st
Hi all,
I've had another detailed look at partman-auto-crypto tonight.
(/people/alphix-guest/partman-auto-crypto) Quick summary: The
package seems solid from my tests and review of the code; I
think it's ready to move to trunk/ and have a first upload after
two points are solved.
Thanks to David
5 matches
Mail list logo
