Re: packages from potato-proposed-updates used in 2.2.21 bf

2001-04-01 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Previously Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > Still waiting for the pcmcia packages... > > They should be there now.. Can you tell me exactly (host/path please!) where they are? I'm using David Wheadon's non-uploaded versions, http://people.debian.org/~dwhe

Re: packages from potato-proposed-updates used in 2.2.21 bf

2001-03-28 Thread Adam Di Carlo
David Whedon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 06:45:03PM +0200 wrote: > > Previously Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > > Still waiting for the pcmcia packages... > > > > They should be there now.. > Does this mean there are two sets of the pcmcia packages floating around now > meant for

Re: packages from potato-proposed-updates used in 2.2.21 bf

2001-03-27 Thread David Whedon
Does this mean there are two sets of the pcmcia packages floating around now meant for 2.2r3? I made these: http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot-0103/msg00522.html If there are others with the same versioning this could be confusing. It looks like there is a: pcmcia-modules-2.2.19pre17-ide_3.1.2

Re: packages from potato-proposed-updates used in 2.2.21 bf

2001-03-27 Thread Martin Schulze
Adam Di Carlo wrote: > Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Please use libc 2.1.3-18 instead, it fixes an interesting ldd bug. > > Um, I don't see this built for i386 yet. It's there now. Regards, Joey -- Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correc

Re: packages from potato-proposed-updates used in 2.2.21 bf

2001-03-27 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Adam Di Carlo wrote: > Still waiting for the pcmcia packages... They should be there now.. Wichert. -- _ / Nothing is fool-proof to a sufficiently talented fool \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http:/

Re: packages from potato-proposed-updates used in 2.2.21 bf

2001-03-24 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Please use libc 2.1.3-18 instead, it fixes an interesting ldd bug. Um, I don't see this built for i386 yet. -- .Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onshored.com/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscrib

Re: packages from potato-proposed-updates used in 2.2.21 bf

2001-03-24 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Please use libc 2.1.3-18 instead, it fixes an interesting ldd bug. Oh! Oops! Ok, I'll fix this for my next build. Still waiting for the pcmcia packages... -- .Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onshored.com/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: packages from potato-proposed-updates used in 2.2.21 bf

2001-03-24 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Adam Di Carlo wrote: > FYI, I used the following packages (and only the following packages) > from Potato proposed updates when building 2.2.21. Let me know if I > am missing any. Please use libc 2.1.3-18 instead, it fixes an interesting ldd bug. Wichert. --

packages from potato-proposed-updates used in 2.2.21 bf

2001-03-24 Thread Adam Di Carlo
FYI, I used the following packages (and only the following packages) from Potato proposed updates when building 2.2.21. Let me know if I am missing any. -rw-r--r--1 apharris staff 2164106 Jan 23 17:30 libc6-dev_2.1.3-17_i386.deb -rw-r--r--1 apharris staff 670676 Jan 23 17:27 li