* Gaudenz Steinlin [090914 23:00 +0200]
> On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 10:27:01PM -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
> >
> > So, for a distribution kernel, I guess that, once nobody complains
> > about the problems, we can just standardize on snd-powermac (and
> > have people have a working setup) and documen
Benjamin Cama escribió:
Hi,
Le lundi 14 septembre 2009 à 23:00 +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin a écrit :
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 10:27:01PM -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
So, for a distribution kernel, I guess that, once nobody complains
about the problems, we can just standardize on snd-powermac
Le lundi 14 septembre 2009 à 15:09 -0700, Johannes Berg a écrit :
> On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 00:08 +0200, Benjamin Cama wrote:
>
> > Completely agree with that. snd-aoa was made for newer Macs AFAIK, and
> > it works very well here. The one that cause problem here is a
> > powermac3,3 which is an old
On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 00:08 +0200, Benjamin Cama wrote:
> Completely agree with that. snd-aoa was made for newer Macs AFAIK, and
> it works very well here. The one that cause problem here is a
> powermac3,3 which is an old model, and which is not supported by snd-aoa
> according to http://johannes
Hello,
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Benjamin Cama wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le lundi 14 septembre 2009 à 23:00 +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin a écrit :
>> On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 10:27:01PM -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
>> >
>> > So, for a distribution kernel, I guess that, once nobody complains
>> > about the
Hi,
Le lundi 14 septembre 2009 à 23:00 +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin a écrit :
> On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 10:27:01PM -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
> >
> > So, for a distribution kernel, I guess that, once nobody complains
> > about the problems, we can just standardize on snd-powermac (and
> > have people
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 10:27:01PM -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
>
> So, for a distribution kernel, I guess that, once nobody complains
> about the problems, we can just standardize on snd-powermac (and
> have people have a working setup) and document the potential
> (perhaps nonexistent?) problem i
Le Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 10:27:01PM -0300, Rogério Brito a écrit :
>
> It seems that on some G5 machines, snd-powerpc could cause some lock
> ups, but the problem was reported ages ago and it seems to have been
> fixed. I'm not sure if Charles Plessy (in CC) still has his dual G5 and
> can test
Hi, Everybody.
On Sep 13, 2009, at 01:41, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Sat, 2009-09-12 at 19:33 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Do you know a way for us to know if aoa or powerpc is the right
choice? Or the oposite, a way to know that aoa is known to be broken
in a set of machine ids or like
On Sat, 2009-09-12 at 19:33 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Do you know a way for us to know if aoa or powerpc is the right
> choice? Or the oposite, a way to know that aoa is known to be broken
> in a set of machine ids or like?
>
Well, generally speaking, aoa only picks up machines it knows abou
Hello Benjamin,
2009/9/9 Benjamin Herrenschmidt :
> On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 12:12 -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
>> Right, but now the snd-powermac driver is what is being used instead
>> of
>> the snd-aoa* driver.
>>
>> Perhaps BenH (one of the principal developers of Linux on PowerPC)
>> could
>> she
On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 12:12 -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
> Right, but now the snd-powermac driver is what is being used instead
> of
> the snd-aoa* driver.
>
> Perhaps BenH (one of the principal developers of Linux on PowerPC)
> could
> shed some comments here with the final word so that we can set
The correct machine ID is probably PowerBook3,3.
Risto
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Just for the record, I'm including here people from debian-boot, so that
this extra piece of information gets somehow included in future versions
of d-i (if it is not incorporated already).
On Sep 07 2009, sergio sevillano wrote:
> Rogério Brito escribió:
> >See if it works and reportback. If that
14 matches
Mail list logo
