On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 01:12:38PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> We can and should remove the warning about /boot once a current
> version of grub2 gets into testing
This is of course nonsense for now, sorry - a current version of grub2
makes /boot on extN and / on btrfs work, but not yet /boot on
On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 12:09:23PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Colin Watson wrote:
> > Is it worth uploading partman-btrfs now? I expect there'll be some lead
> > time in NEW anyway, and we might as well get started even if you still
> > need a custom kernel to make use of it.
>
> I'd be ok with th
Hello,
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Colin Watson wrote:
> Is it worth uploading partman-btrfs now? I expect there'll be some lead
> time in NEW anyway, and we might as well get started even if you still
> need a custom kernel to make use of it.
>
I think it is worth it; we can leave it in
Colin Watson wrote:
> Is it worth uploading partman-btrfs now? I expect there'll be some lead
> time in NEW anyway, and we might as well get started even if you still
> need a custom kernel to make use of it.
I'd be ok with that, with the proviso that I have not tested it in the
least.
--
see s
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 01:26:28PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> I was distracted from adding btrfs to d-i due to the btrfs/dpkg data
> loss issue (now fixed). Colin just did some work on grub that should fix
> #540786.
I uploaded this last Thursday.
> The other bug that needs to be fixed is #567176,
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 01:26:28PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Bastian Blank wrote:
> > Please provide references as new udebs are only allowed with approval of
> > the debian-installer team.
> I'm not aware of any such policy; there's no mention of such a requirement
> in the developers reference or
On 05/19/2010 08:13 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/btrfs-tools_0.19-9.html
(jftr:) ...which shows that i've uploaded the btrfs-tools version with
the udeb on the very same day when joeyh reported the bug, 2010-01-27.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstras
On 05/19/2010 07:26 PM, Joey Hess wrote:
> The btrfs-tools-udeb has still not been uploaded AFAICS. #567075 is
> still open. I'm puzzled that the git repository claims 0.19-11 was
> released, but the archive still has 0.19-8. Surely it's not been stuck
> in NEW for months?
i hope you didn't though
On Wednesday 19 May 2010, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Please provide references as new udebs are only allowed with approval
> > of the debian-installer team.
>
> I'm not aware of any such policy; there's no mention of such a
> requirement in the developers reference or debian policy manual.
http://lists.
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 13:26:28 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> The btrfs-tools-udeb has still not been uploaded AFAICS. #567075 is
> still open. I'm puzzled that the git repository claims 0.19-11 was
> released, but the archive still has 0.19-8. Surely it's not been stuck
> in NEW for months?
>
http:
Bastian Blank wrote:
> There was a udeb uploaded some months ago: btrfs-tools-udeb. I was not
> able to find any discussion about this matter.
>
> Please provide references as new udebs are only allowed with approval of
> the debian-installer team.
I'm not aware of any such policy; there's no men
On 05/19/2010 11:19 AM, Bastian Blank wrote:
> There was a udeb uploaded some months ago: btrfs-tools-udeb. I was not
> able to find any discussion about this matter.
joeyh requested it.
> Please provide references as new udebs are only allowed with approval of
> the debian-installer team.
see b
Hi
There was a udeb uploaded some months ago: btrfs-tools-udeb. I was not
able to find any discussion about this matter.
Please provide references as new udebs are only allowed with approval of
the debian-installer team.
Bastian
--
Fascinating is a word I use for the unexpected.
13 matches
Mail list logo
