On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 00:26 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> > - Get both discover2 and discover1 into testing and apt-install
> > discover1 instead of discover from hw-detect.
>
> This is the original plan, but it got stuck because of some problems
> with discover version 2 and the libdisc
[Per Olofsson]
> Anyway, some ideas on how to solve this:
>
> - Get discover1 into testing. Currently it doesn't migrate because the
> old libdiscover-dev is in its way. The libdiscover1 in unstable
> depends on discover1-data instead of discover-data.
Yes, that would be good. Need some rele
On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 20:22 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Now I see. discover in testing depends on libdiscover1. libdiscover1
> > in testing in turn depends on discover-data. But discover-data in
> > testing is discover2's data. So that's what you get.
>
> !! Isn't this a big problem with testing
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 00:44 -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 01:25:07AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > I want to bring bug #243448, which I've just reassigned to
> > discover1-data, to your attention. I'm afraid it may represent a whole
> > class of bugs. It seems that newer ver
On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 01:25:07AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> I want to bring bug #243448, which I've just reassigned to
> discover1-data, to your attention. I'm afraid it may represent a whole
> class of bugs. It seems that newer versions of discover fail to load
> modules for many ethernet cards.
Per Olofsson wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 23:29 +0200, Per Olofsson wrote:
> > Okay, I understand. I usually install unstable, so that's my
> > problem. But the person you're referring to is upgrading to
> > discover2's discover-data, anyway, as you can tell from the version
> > number.
>
> No
On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 23:29 +0200, Per Olofsson wrote:
> Okay, I understand. I usually install unstable, so that's my
> problem. But the person you're referring to is upgrading to
> discover2's discover-data, anyway, as you can tell from the version
> number.
Now I see. discover in testing depen
On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 17:17 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Per Olofsson wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 01:25 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > > I want to bring bug #243448, which I've just reassigned to
> > > discover1-data, to your attention.
> >
> > You mean discover-data.
>
> I do?
"Bug reassigne
Per Olofsson wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 01:25 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > I want to bring bug #243448, which I've just reassigned to
> > discover1-data, to your attention.
>
> You mean discover-data.
I do?
> > > discover-data .. network lost
> > > it's version 2.2004.02.24-5 and replaced
Per Olofsson schrieb am Dienstag, 20. April 2004 um 21:48:28 +0200:
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 01:25 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > I want to bring bug #243448, which I've just reassigned to
> > discover1-data, to your attention.
>
> You mean discover-data.
>
> > > discover-data .. network lost
> >
On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 01:25 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> I want to bring bug #243448, which I've just reassigned to
> discover1-data, to your attention.
You mean discover-data.
> > discover-data .. network lost
> > it's version 2.2004.02.24-5 and replaced
> > 1.2004.02-08-1
Well, I think it's ju
I want to bring bug #243448, which I've just reassigned to
discover1-data, to your attention. I'm afraid it may represent a whole
class of bugs. It seems that newer versions of discover fail to load
modules for many ethernet cards. The reporter of this bug did an
excellent isolation of the problem,
12 matches
Mail list logo
