Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 11:01:34AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> > Glad to see a new debootstrap with the fixes but the timing was just
> > *awful*...
> >
> > /me considers build 2.3.7 right away...
>
> Are there 2.3.6 images available for testing anywh
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 11:01:34AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> Glad to see a new debootstrap with the fixes but the timing was just
> *awful*...
>
> /me considers build 2.3.7 right away...
Are there 2.3.6 images available for testing anywhere?
Matt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTE
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 02:01:57AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> Richard Hirst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hi, I sent you this patch about a week ago, but it isn't in the
> > new source; did you not like it for some reason? I realise it wont
> > apply cleanly now, since you have woody.debs
Richard Hirst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi, I sent you this patch about a week ago, but it isn't in the
> new source; did you not like it for some reason? I realise it wont
> apply cleanly now, since you have woody.debs. Would you like me to
> regenerate?
I would guess you should regenerat
On Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 09:24:19AM +0100, Richard Hirst wrote:
> Hi, I sent you this patch about a week ago, but it isn't in the
> new source; did you not like it for some reason?
You didn't file a bug about it, so I forgot. File a bug. :) (For some
reason I thought you'd already done this, so
On Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 12:00:39PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> There's a new debootstrap in incoming which includes groff-base and some
> other changes. Probably worth a rebuild of b-f's, as with current/old
> debootstrap's, groff (in base) dies be
Hi guys,
There's a new debootstrap in incoming which includes groff-base and some
other changes. Probably worth a rebuild of b-f's, as with current/old
debootstrap's, groff (in base) dies because it depends on groff-base.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL
7 matches
Mail list logo
