the implementation of Linux's unpacker).
> Do you have any preferences? And is anyone using network-console on
> armhf yet? (Just wondering if I can make changes without breaking
> things)
Hector added it along with all the other armhf images way back. I suspect
this was just becau
* Karsten Merker [2016-01-04 08:25]:
> > 2) Kernel/ramdisk and uImages
> >
> > At the moment, armhf requires users to append the DTB and generate an
> > uImage. Obviously, the same approach would work for these NAS devices
> > but I'd like to make it as easy for users as possible. So I was
> >
On Jan 3, 2016, at 6:11 PM, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Rick Thomas [2016-01-03 18:06]:
>>> And is anyone using network-console on armhf yet? (Just wondering
>>> if I can make changes without breaking things)
>>
>> I have two Cubox-i4pro (armhf) machines that
* Rick Thomas [2016-01-03 18:06]:
> > And is anyone using network-console on armhf yet? (Just wondering
> > if I can make changes without breaking things)
>
> I have two Cubox-i4pro (armhf) machines that I installed jessie on
> recently using network console (ssh in to ru
Hi martin,
On Jan 3, 2016, at 2:41 PM, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> And is anyone using network-console on
> armhf yet? (Just wondering if I can make changes without breaking
> things)
I have two Cubox-i4pro (armhf) machines that I installed jessie on recently
using network console (
you have any preferences? And is anyone using network-console on
armhf yet? (Just wondering if I can make changes without breaking
things)
2) Kernel/ramdisk and uImages
At the moment, armhf requires users to append the DTB and generate an
uImage. Obviously, the same approach would work for these
6 matches
Mail list logo
