Re: mklibs.py, unresolved symbol

2001-09-16 Thread Ethan Benson
On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 11:55:21PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > Can you send along the patch? > > I was able to build fine (only patching in one place) so I'm getting > really confused. It must be a difference between your build > environment and mine. I wonder if mklibs.py is especially sen

Re: mklibs.py, unresolved symbol

2001-09-16 Thread Ethan Benson
On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 05:25:56PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > Ethan, I was finding other problems with mklibs.py on powerpc, to wit, > ld-linux.so.2 was used in a non-portable way. To get it to work on > PowerPC, I had to use this patch. i patched it in two places where i found the i386ism

Re: mklibs.py, unresolved symbol

2001-09-16 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 05:25:56PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > Ethan, I was finding other problems with mklibs.py on powerpc, to wit, > ld-linux.so.2 was used in a non-portable way. To get it to work on > PowerPC, I had to use this patch. > > Is anyone interesting in fixing these problems?

mklibs.py, unresolved symbol

2001-09-05 Thread Ethan Benson
the last unresolvable symbol for the powerpc root disks is: calling readelf -s /var/tmp/boot-floppies/root-tmp-14083/lib/libpopt.so.0.0.0-so-stripped Still need: atexit 570 symbols, 1 unresolved -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/ PGP signature