Bug#211092: [vorlon@netexpress.net: Re: mklibs and brltty]

2003-09-27 Thread Geert Stappers
Information from mailinglist: - Forwarded message from Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 14:50:38 -0500 From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Mario Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: mklibs and brltty In-Reply-To:

Bug#211092: [mlang@debian.org: Re: mklibs and brltty]

2003-09-27 Thread Geert Stappers
Information from the mailinglist: - Forwarded message from Mario Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: mklibs and brltty In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Bastian Blank's message of "Sun, 7 Sep 2003 21:14:46 +0200") From: Mario Lang &l

Re: mklibs and brltty

2003-09-26 Thread Geert Stappers
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 03:31:20PM +0200, Mario Lang wrote: > Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 09:04:39PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > >> Could weak symbols solve the problem? I'm not very familiar with > >> shared library internals, but I believe a w

Re: mklibs and brltty

2003-09-26 Thread Steve Langasek
[Cc:ed to Mario on account of the lists.d.o mail delays] On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 03:27:06PM +0200, Mario Lang wrote: > Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 03:50:53PM +0200, Mario Lang wrote: > >> Now, the question is what would be the proper fix for this problem.

Re: mklibs and brltty

2003-09-25 Thread Mario Lang
Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 09:04:39PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: >> Could weak symbols solve the problem? I'm not very familiar with >> shared library internals, but I believe a weak symbol will be selected >> from the library if no other matching s

Re: mklibs and brltty

2003-09-25 Thread Mario Lang
Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 03:50:53PM +0200, Mario Lang wrote: >> Now, the question is what would be the proper fix for this problem. >> >> I do see several: >> >> 1. Work around this problem by patching mklibs such that it >>detects that a certain symbo

Re: mklibs and brltty

2003-09-07 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 09:04:39PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > Could weak symbols solve the problem? I'm not very familiar with > shared library internals, but I believe a weak symbol will be selected > from the library if no other matching symbol is available. If the > library provides s

Re: mklibs and brltty

2003-09-07 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Mario Lang] > Now, the question is what would be the proper fix for this problem. Could weak symbols solve the problem? I'm not very familiar with shared library internals, but I believe a weak symbol will be selected from the library if no other matching symbol is available. If the library pr

Re: mklibs and brltty

2003-09-04 Thread Matt Kraai
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 03:50:53PM +0200, Mario Lang wrote: > Now, the question is what would be the proper fix for this problem. > > I do see several: > > 1. Work around this problem by patching mklibs such that it >detects that a certain symbol is provided by an executable. This is the cor

mklibs and brltty

2003-09-04 Thread Mario Lang
Hi. I just realized that library reduction fails with the newest mklibs and brltty. Some attempt to get enlightenment about this problem on IRC failed. If anyone can explain what the truly correct fix for this problem would be, please do so! The bug: mklibs fails with the followin error: No