Re: Menu Item numbering

2003-06-08 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Chris Tillman] > These values were from grep -r. Comparing to the doc, it looks like the > only questions are netcfg (overlapping with kbd-chooser and choose-mirror) No opinion on these. > and baseconfig-udeb, which uses 85 that was supposed to be reserved. It should have a 'never default'-kin

Re: Menu Item numbering

2003-06-07 Thread Chris Tillman
On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 10:15:07AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > [Chris Tillman] > > I don't know if it's really significant, but there are a > > few conflicts in the menu numbering: > > It might be correct. At least s390 and ddetect are used on different > architectures. > > Did you chec

Re: Menu Item numbering

2003-06-07 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Chris Tillman] > I don't know if it's really significant, but there are a > few conflicts in the menu numbering: It might be correct. At least s390 and ddetect are used on different architectures. Did you check if the information in d-i/doc/menu-item-numbers.txt is up to date? If it isn't, we

Menu Item numbering

2003-06-06 Thread Chris Tillman
I don't know if it's really significant, but there are a few conflicts in the menu numbering: tools/languagechooser/debian/control:XB-Installer-Menu-Item: 10 tools/s390/netdevice/debian/control:XB-Installer-Menu-Item: 11<-- tools/ddetect/debian/control:XB-Installer-Menu-Item: 11 <-

Re: menu item numbering

2002-12-08 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Tollef Fog Heen] > Martin also suggested that no menu items should have the same > number. If so, we need to allocate numbers and track which have > been given out. This is a really bad idea. One nice feature in d-i is the fact that you can modify and extend at will without any central coordin

Re: menu item numbering

2002-12-04 Thread Denis Barbier
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 03:08:59AM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > > Currently, the menu ordering is a bit chaotic. I therefore propose we > do something like this; order it into stages. The names aren't the > best, but I think it's clear what I want. > > 0 -> 10 Reserved As shown in a previou

menu item numbering

2002-12-03 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
Currently, the menu ordering is a bit chaotic. I therefore propose we do something like this; order it into stages. The names aren't the best, but I think it's clear what I want. 0 -> 10 Reserved 10 -> 20 Preparation - ethdetect - netcfg-{dhcp,static} - cdrom-detect 20 -> 30 Installer setup -