Anthony Towns wrote:
> You'll note I didn't say the install media: I said "rescue disk". We
> can't reasonably do without a rescue disk; whether it's the same as
> the installer or some other difficult to maintain offshoot of b-f's is
> another matter.
Ok, fair enough.
Although I have never used
On Mon, Dec 25, 2000 at 01:03:25AM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
> Anthony Towns wrote:
> > We need lilo on a rescue disk, at least...
> Take another look at the system. I'm not even guarenteeing a *shell* on
> the install media.
You'll note I didn't say the install media: I said "rescue disk". We
can'
Hello!
Sorry, I'm a mutt beginner ;)
I forgot to cc to the list again.
Thanks,
Gergely
- Forwarded message from Gergely Risko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2000 22:59:23 +0100
From: Gergely Risko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED
Gergely Risko wrote:
> You mean, before restart but after base-system installed, we can apt-get
> from a chroot for example?
Right. We could use apt or use the retreiver system that's part of d-i,
it is capable of parsing normal Packages files and downloading regular
.deb packages too.
We have t
Anthony Towns wrote:
> We need lilo on a rescue disk, at least...
Take another look at the system. I'm not even guarenteeing a *shell* on
the install media.
--
see shy jo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello!
> We definatly need boot loaders (at least one for each arch) to integrate
> into either cdebconf or debconf, but it doesnt need to be a core
> component.
>
> Core componenents should be just enough to start the install process.
>
> A boot loader can be fetched by whatever fetch method i
On Mon, Dec 25, 2000 at 05:44:16PM +1100, Glenn McGrath wrote:
>
> We definatly need boot loaders (at least one for each arch) to integrate
> into either cdebconf or debconf, but it doesnt need to be a core
> component.
I'm not sure if this has been discussed, but how will/can say the
partitioni
Anthony Towns wrote:
>
> On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 09:25:17AM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Gergely Risko wrote:
> > > I made an udeb for lilo. You can find the patch for the unstable lilo
> > > in bug 80390.
> > Why do we need a lilo udeb?
>
> We need lilo on a rescue disk, at least...
>
> Cheers,
On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 09:25:17AM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
> Gergely Risko wrote:
> > I made an udeb for lilo. You can find the patch for the unstable lilo
> > in bug 80390.
> Why do we need a lilo udeb?
We need lilo on a rescue disk, at least...
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 09:25:17AM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
> Gergely Risko wrote:
> > I made an udeb for lilo. You can find the patch for the unstable lilo
> > in bug 80390.
>
> Why do we need a lilo udeb?
>
> By the time lilo runs, we should have a full debian base system set up,
> so we could
Hello!
On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 09:51:45AM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
> Gergely Risko wrote:
> > But in the base system we won't got grub or bmconf for example, so we
> > need udebs for other loaders (I think), and in this case it will be
> > clearer if we got an udeb for lilo.
>
> Right but couldn'
Hello!
On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 09:25:17AM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
> Gergely Risko wrote:
> > I made an udeb for lilo. You can find the patch for the unstable lilo
> > in bug 80390.
>
> Why do we need a lilo udeb?
>
> By the time lilo runs, we should have a full debian base system set up,
> so
Gergely Risko wrote:
> I made an udeb for lilo. You can find the patch for the unstable lilo
> in bug 80390.
Why do we need a lilo udeb?
By the time lilo runs, we should have a full debian base system set up,
so we could just run lilo from there.
--
see shy jo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [
Hello!
I made an udeb for lilo. You can find the patch for the unstable lilo
in bug 80390.
Greetings,
Gergely Risko
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
14 matches
Mail list logo
