Re: legal stuff about miBoot

2004-03-26 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Sat, 2004-03-27 at 13:01, Jeremie Koenig wrote: > On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 12:00:21PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > 1.0d4 has numerous issues and will not work with recent kernels afaik. > > > > Why is there a problem using the more recent one ? > > I have only succeeded loading "mib

Re: legal stuff about miBoot

2004-03-26 Thread Jeremie Koenig
On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 12:00:21PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > 1.0d4 has numerous issues and will not work with recent kernels afaik. > > Why is there a problem using the more recent one ? I have only succeeded loading "miboot.image" files. This is annoying, because Debian kernel packa

Re: legal stuff about miBoot

2004-03-26 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Sat, 2004-03-27 at 03:28, Jeremie Koenig wrote: > On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 08:55:40AM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > Where did you get your "upstream" version ? miBoot is distributed as > > part of the BootX package (shares some sources with it) and is GPLed > > > > Make sure you get a

legal stuff about miBoot

2004-03-26 Thread Jeremie Koenig
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 08:55:40AM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > Where did you get your "upstream" version ? miBoot is distributed as > part of the BootX package (shares some sources with it) and is GPLed > > Make sure you get an up to date version. I've tried to use the version in BootX