Your message dated Thu, 16 May 2024 19:20:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1060134: fixed in busybox 1:1.36.1-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #1060134,
regarding kmod-udeb vs busybox-udeb: agree on who ships depmod
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Marco d'Itri (2024-04-26):
> On Apr 26, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>
> > So, should I disable module utils in busybox-udeb now?
> I think so.
I haven't gotten any requests / seen any reasons to keep it; so, yes,
please feel free to remove it whenever is convenient for you.
> > Is kmod udeb ready a
Ok,
I'm removing whole modutils from busybox udeb (besides depmod, this is
lsmod, insmod, rmmod, and modprobe). All these are provided by
kmod-udeb as far as I can see (as symlinks to kod).
--
GPG Key transition (from rsa2048 to rsa4096) since 2024-04-24.
New key: rsa4096/61AD3D98ECDF2C8E 9D8B
On Apr 26, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> So, should I disable module utils in busybox-udeb now?
I think so.
> Is kmod udeb ready and used in d-i already, or does it need some
> prep first?
AFAIK it works.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
09.04.2024 16:48, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Marco d'Itri (2024-04-09):
Yes. Nowadays kmod has many more features related to compressed modules
and verification of signatures.
Can we agree that kmod should provide these programs for d-i?
Or can the d-i maintainers just tell us what they want?
I m
Hi,
Marco d'Itri (2024-04-09):
> Yes. Nowadays kmod has many more features related to compressed modules
> and verification of signatures.
> Can we agree that kmod should provide these programs for d-i?
> Or can the d-i maintainers just tell us what they want?
I meant to come back to this after
On Jan 06, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> Yes, some utils in busybox aren't as good as regular implementations. For
Yes. Nowadays kmod has many more features related to compressed modules
and verification of signatures.
Can we agree that kmod should provide these programs for d-i?
Or can the d-i maint
06.01.2024 11:40, Helmut Grohne:
On Sat, Jan 06, 2024 at 09:01:12AM +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:
I also recommend to establish QA for all udebs to automatically detect,
report and address such conflicts as they evidently cause undefined
behaviour otherwise. That can be as simple as collecting fil
On Sat, Jan 06, 2024 at 09:01:12AM +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> I also recommend to establish QA for all udebs to automatically detect,
> report and address such conflicts as they evidently cause undefined
> behaviour otherwise. That can be as simple as collecting file lists of
> all udebs and com
Package: kmod-udeb,busybox-udeb
Severity: serious
Justification: file conflict
X-Debbugs-Cc: Cyril Brulebois , debian-boot@lists.debian.org
Hi Cyril,
On Sat, Jan 06, 2024 at 04:31:44AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> d-i daily builds now FTBFS everywhere due to the merge-usr step, with
> the foll
10 matches
Mail list logo
