On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 01:38:26PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Discussing with Jeff Bailey on IRC today indicates that a solution is
> forthcoming on this bug: he estimates that in a week, there will be new
> glibc packages in the archive that don't depend on the upstream kernel
> headers for w
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 01:38:26PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Is this an acceptable
> timeline to d-i folks for having headers that can be used for building
> busybox on ia64 and alpha (estimate 3 weeks to testing)
where are currently in a freeze sta
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 09:27:47PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 01:38:26PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Is this an acceptable
> > timeline to d-i folks for having headers that can be used for building
> > busybox on ia64 and a
Discussing with Jeff Bailey on IRC today indicates that a solution is
forthcoming on this bug: he estimates that in a week, there will be new
glibc packages in the archive that don't depend on the upstream kernel
headers for what they expose to userspace. Is this an acceptable
timeline to d-i folk
On Thu Sep 11, 2003 at 12:48:55AM +0100, Richard Hirst wrote:
> package: busybox-cvs
> version: 0.60.99.cvs20030819
>
> On ia64 the kernel has CONFIG_TR undefined (token ring). The busybox
> build pulls in /usr/include/linux/autoconf.h, which includes the line
>
> #undef CONFIG_TR
>
> That resu
package: busybox-cvs
version: 0.60.99.cvs20030819
On ia64 the kernel has CONFIG_TR undefined (token ring). The busybox
build pulls in /usr/include/linux/autoconf.h, which includes the line
#undef CONFIG_TR
That results in the 'tr' applet being disabled in the config-udeb build.
The include seq
6 matches
Mail list logo