Bug#899093: marked as done (flash-kernel: update Pine64+)

2018-08-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 19 Aug 2018 21:49:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#899093: fixed in flash-kernel 3.95 has caused the Debian Bug report #899093, regarding flash-kernel: update Pine64+ to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#899091: marked as done ([PATCH 1/1] flash-kernel: update Firefly-RK3399 Board)

2018-08-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 19 Aug 2018 21:49:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#899091: fixed in flash-kernel 3.95 has caused the Debian Bug report #899091, regarding [PATCH 1/1] flash-kernel: update Firefly-RK3399 Board to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#899096: marked as done (flash-kernel: update Raspberry Pi 3 Model B)

2018-08-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 19 Aug 2018 21:49:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#899096: fixed in flash-kernel 3.95 has caused the Debian Bug report #899096, regarding flash-kernel: update Raspberry Pi 3 Model B to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#899093: flash-kernel: update Pine64+

2018-05-20 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
Control: tags 899093 +pending On 2018-05-18, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > Current U-Boot prepends 'allwinner/' to fdtfile. > > Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt > --- > db/all.db | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/db/all.db b/db/all.db > index 97eff67..635f

Processed: Re: Bug#899093: flash-kernel: update Pine64+

2018-05-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags 899093 +pending Bug #899093 [flash-kernel] flash-kernel: update Pine64+ Added tag(s) pending. -- 899093: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=899093 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#899096: flash-kernel: update Raspberry Pi 3 Model B

2018-05-18 Thread Heinrich Schuchardt
Package: flash-kernel Version: 3.94 Severity: normal Tags: patch 64bit U-Boot prefixes fdtfile with 'broadcom/'. As flash-kernel will copy the dtb both to dtbs/${VERSION}/ and dtbs/${VERSION}/broadcom/ adding the prefix in the database won't harm 32bit U-Boot installations. Signed-off-

Processed: Re: Bug#899091: [PATCH 1/1] flash-kernel: update Firefly-RK3399 Board

2018-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags 899091 +pending Bug #899091 [flash-kernel] [PATCH 1/1] flash-kernel: update Firefly-RK3399 Board Added tag(s) pending. -- 899091: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=899091 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#899091: [PATCH 1/1] flash-kernel: update Firefly-RK3399 Board

2018-05-18 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
Control: tags 899091 +pending Thanks for the patch! Pushed to git. live well, vagrant On 2018-05-18, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > Package: flash-kernel > Version: 3.94 > Severity: normal > Tags: patch > > Current U-Boot prepends 'rockchip/' path in fdtfile variable. > > Signed-off-by: Heinric

Bug#899093: flash-kernel: update Pine64+

2018-05-18 Thread Heinrich Schuchardt
Package: flash-kernel Version: 3.94 Severity: normal Tags: patch Current U-Boot prepends 'allwinner/' to fdtfile. Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt --- db/all.db | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/db/all.db b/db/all.db index 97eff67..635fe27 100644 --- a/db/all

Bug#899091: [PATCH 1/1] flash-kernel: update Firefly-RK3399 Board

2018-05-18 Thread Heinrich Schuchardt
Package: flash-kernel Version: 3.94 Severity: normal Tags: patch Current U-Boot prepends 'rockchip/' path in fdtfile variable. Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt --- db/all.db | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/db/all.db b/db/all.db index e63f632..a0fea2d 100644

Bug#810828: marked as done (flash-kernel: update kernel address for Linkstation LS-WTGL)

2016-02-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 13 Feb 2016 16:25:15 + with message-id and subject line Bug#810828: fixed in flash-kernel 3.57 has caused the Debian Bug report #810828, regarding flash-kernel: update kernel address for Linkstation LS-WTGL to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#810828: flash-kernel: update kernel address for Linkstation LS-WTGL

2016-02-08 Thread Roger Shimizu
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 1:28 AM, Roger Shimizu wrote: > On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 7:17 AM, Martin Michlmayr wrote: >> Your patch sets the kernel load address to 0x00c08000. So u-boot will >> still load the kernel to 0x0010 but then (I guess) it's >> uncompressed at 0x00c08000. The problem is

Bug#810828: flash-kernel: update kernel address for Linkstation LS-WTGL

2016-01-23 Thread Roger Shimizu
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 7:17 AM, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > Your patch sets the kernel load address to 0x00c08000. So u-boot will > still load the kernel to 0x0010 but then (I guess) it's > uncompressed at 0x00c08000. The problem is that 0x00c08000 is only 4 > MB after the start of the ramdis

Bug#810828: flash-kernel: update kernel address for Linkstation LS-WTGL

2016-01-22 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Roger Shimizu [2016-01-13 01:58]: > For Linkstation LS-WTGL boots fine with linux-image-4.3, but fails with > linux-image-4.4. > Here's the fix ported from QNAP TS-109 (Bug #809476), and it's been confirmed > to boot well on LS-WTGL. I don't fully grok this stuff either but I think this patch i

Bug#810828: flash-kernel: update kernel address for Linkstation LS-WTGL

2016-01-12 Thread Roger Shimizu
Enclosed is the u-boot environment and dmesg (after applying the patch). LS-WTGL_env.txt.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data dmesg_LS-WTGL_4.4.0-rc8-orion5x.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data

Bug#810828: flash-kernel: update kernel address for Linkstation LS-WTGL

2016-01-12 Thread Roger Shimizu
Package: flash-kernel Version: 3.52~bpo8+1 Severity: important Tags: patch X-Debbugs-Cc: t...@cyrius.com, i...@hellion.org.uk, rogershim...@gmail.com Dear Maintainer, For Linkstation LS-WTGL boots fine with linux-image-4.3, but fails with linux-image-4.4. Here's the fix ported from QNAP TS-109 (B

Bug#781371: marked as done (flash-kernel: Update machine entry for OpenRD boards)

2015-03-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 29 Mar 2015 13:22:58 +0100 with message-id <1427631778.1320.48.ca...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#781371: flash-kernel: Update machine entry for OpenRD boards has caused the Debian Bug report #781371, regarding flash-kernel: Update machine entry for OpenRD

Bug#781371: flash-kernel: Update machine entry for OpenRD boards

2015-03-29 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde
On 03/28/2015 11:07 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Sat, 2015-03-28 at 08:33 +, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: >> since linux kernel version 3.16 the OpenRD boards have been converted >> to device tree. Indeed it's v3.17-rc1 not v3.16. > Exclusively? My understanding was that while DT support became a

Bug#781371: flash-kernel: Update machine entry for OpenRD boards

2015-03-28 Thread Ian Campbell
On Sat, 2015-03-28 at 08:33 +, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: > since linux kernel version 3.16 the OpenRD boards have been converted > to device tree. Exclusively? My understanding was that while DT support became available earlier the board file support was not removed for most kirkwood platforms

Bug#781371: flash-kernel: Update machine entry for OpenRD boards

2015-03-28 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde
Package: flash-kernel Version: 3.33 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, since linux kernel version 3.16 the OpenRD boards have been converted to device tree. regrads, Marc -- System Information: Debian Release: 8.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (700, 'testing'), (70, 'experimental'), (70, '

Re: flash-kernel update

2015-03-04 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Ian Campbell (2015-03-04): > (adding kibi for the unblock question. I also added d-boot I don't > think there is anything sensitive here so I hope that's ok) Sure, no worries. > On Tue, 2015-03-03 at 21:30 +0100, Karsten Merker wrote: > > Btw, does anything speak against requesting an unblock fo

Re: flash-kernel update

2015-03-04 Thread Ian Campbell
(adding kibi for the unblock question. I also added d-boot I don't think there is anything sensitive here so I hope that's ok) On Tue, 2015-03-03 at 21:30 +0100, Karsten Merker wrote: > On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 08:45:55AM +, Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Mon, 2015-03-02 at 23:19 +0100, Karsten Mer