On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 09:58:21AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Sunday 18 June 2006 22:54, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Just for information, the freedi project was never intented to be a
> > fork, it was a place for holding more experimental d-i stuff, which the
> > d-i team doesn't want into d-i proper
On Sunday 18 June 2006 22:54, Sven Luther wrote:
> Just for information, the freedi project was never intented to be a
> fork, it was a place for holding more experimental d-i stuff, which the
> d-i team doesn't want into d-i proper for whatever reasons, as you can
> see in the desciption.
Thank y
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 04:58:32PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> So when we are back to work and there is actual
> source code at http://alioth.debian.org/projects/freedi/
> how will we be interacting with the "Free d-i project"?
Just for information, the freedi project was never intented to be a
Hi Geert,
On Sunday 18 June 2006 16:58, Geert Stappers wrote:
> My question is ( my worries are) : What to do next?
keep on working ?!
> So could a d-i member say or confirm something like
> "it is free software, the good code will survive"
yes, of course.
> "the short term problems are acce
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
This is an attempt to pick up life atfer
the "This is getting ridiculous ..." thread
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 03:54:44PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wanted to reply to this thread earlier, but I was busy with work and RL
> when
>
5 matches
Mail list logo
