Re: disposition of boot-floppies in woody

2001-01-09 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Well, I have no complaints if you get things done earlier, of course :) We'll try. I'm trying to get final Potato bf out. I think they are pretty much ready but we need some new kernels to fix some problems. > I'd presume we'd ship with 2.2.x on the

Re: disposition of boot-floppies in woody

2001-01-02 Thread Anthony Towns
On Sat, Dec 30, 2000 at 01:48:00PM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > Anthony Towns claimed on debian-devel that it would take us "a few > months" to prepare boot-floppies for woody. I think it can be done by > Feb. Well, I have no complaints if you get things done earlier, of course :) > I don't t

Re: disposition of boot-floppies in woody

2000-12-30 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Erik Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The current busybox.deb needs a little work (about 1 hour) before it > will be ready to replace the one in boot-floppies. Mostly, I need > to go through and turn off everything that isn't enabled in the > boot-floppies CVS. Also, some of the choices r

Re: disposition of boot-floppies in woody

2000-12-30 Thread Erik Andersen
On Sat Dec 30, 2000 at 01:48:00PM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > Anthony Towns claimed on debian-devel that it would take us "a few > months" to prepare boot-floppies for woody. I think it can be done by > Feb. I don't think there many major issues. Here's the one's I know > of: > > - use

disposition of boot-floppies in woody

2000-12-30 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Anthony Towns claimed on debian-devel that it would take us "a few months" to prepare boot-floppies for woody. I think it can be done by Feb. I don't think there many major issues. Here's the one's I know of: - use busybox.deb from woody rather than the local CVS copy - dealing with new