On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 21:15:57 +
Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 21:06, Neil Williams
> wrote: ...
> > I cannot recommend any embedded system should use any version of
> > busybox built by Debian for d-i without *also* installing and using
> > coreutils, login, passwd, shadow,
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 21:06, Neil Williams wrote:
...
> I cannot recommend any embedded system should use any version of
> busybox built by Debian for d-i without *also* installing and using
> coreutils, login, passwd, shadow, perl and all the rest. i.e. busybox
> from Debian is only suitable fo
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 20:44, Hector Oron wrote:
...
> Crush development has been postponed until multiarch is ready but some
> of the bits for the proof of concept can be found at emdebian svn [0].
...
What should we do? Just "sync" static with deb and later work on that?
Seems like a more logi
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 20:55:13 +
Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 20:44, Hector Oron
> wrote: ...
> > Crush development has been postponed until multiarch is ready but
> > some of the bits for the proof of concept can be found at emdebian
> > svn [0].
> ...
>
> What should we
Hello Ferenc,
2011/2/15 Ferenc Wagner :
> Otavio Salvador writes:
>
>> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 22:06, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>>
>>> FEATURE_SHADOWPASSWDS
>>> support for getspent() and friends.
>>> Current: deb n static y udeb n
>>> Proposed action: enable for deb
>>> Discussion: It is quite u
Quoting Michael Tokarev (m...@tls.msk.ru):
> Part one of the discussion series. Config options which
> are enabled in udeb and static builds but not enabled
> in regular build.
I won't comment myself (as said already, this is out of my field of
expertise), but I'd suggest to also wait for Joey H
Otavio Salvador writes:
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 22:06, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>
>> FEATURE_SHADOWPASSWDS
>> support for getspent() and friends.
>> Current: deb n static y udeb n
>> Proposed action: enable for deb
>> Discussion: It is quite unexpected that busybox can't
>> use shadow password
First I'd like to thank you for doing that but I'd also want to make
clear that we need to be conservative on udeb flavour since the
installer heavily depends on it. More bellow...
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 22:06, Michael Tokarev wrote:
...
> Just for the record, non-static allyesconfig for i386
>
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 01:06:46AM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> Part one of the discussion series. Config options which
> are enabled in udeb and static builds but not enabled
> in regular build.
I don't disagree with anything you've mentioned. If all of the changes you
recommend were integra
Part one of the discussion series. Config options which
are enabled in udeb and static builds but not enabled
in regular build.
I assume two things:
1) regular build should include at least all options (with
very few exceptions, see below) as udeb and static builds
does.
2) generally, we want t
10 matches
Mail list logo
