On Mon, 21 May 2007, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Before, I was creating the Packages files, and did a 'gzip -c -9
> Packages > Packages.gz' to compress them. If I do them with 'cat
> Packages | gzip --best > Packages.gz', like debian-cd does it, then it
> works.
Turns out this wasn't my problem (at
Neale Banks wrote:
> Extremely weird indeed - and raises the question of just how should we
> generate Packages[.gz] which are acceptable to the current install tools.
> Any suggestions?
Before, I was creating the Packages files, and did a 'gzip -c -9
Packages > Packages.gz' to compress them. If
On Sat, 19 May 2007, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Steve McIntyre wrote:
> > Hmmm. These look *very* similar to issues I've seen in the last few
> > months while hacking on debian-cd:
> >
> > * shortcomings in busybox gunzip (#402482)
>
> thanks ;)
>
> i suspected 'corrupted' indices (or, indicies n
Steve McIntyre wrote:
> Hmmm. These look *very* similar to issues I've seen in the last few
> months while hacking on debian-cd:
>
> * shortcomings in busybox gunzip (#402482)
thanks ;)
i suspected 'corrupted' indices (or, indicies not the way d-i wants
them) rather than corrputed busybox, beca
Joey Hess wrote:
>
>Neale Banks wrote:
>> May 18 00:29:38 debootstrap:
>/target/var/lib/apt/lists/debootstrap.invalid_dists_etch_main_binary-i386_Packages:
> No such file
>or directory
>> May 18 00:29:38 debootstrap:
>/target/var/lib/apt/lists/debootstrap.invalid_dists_etch_main_binary-i386_Package
Joey Hess wrote:
> This suggests that a deb is corrupt or is not being loaded properly,
> since debootstrap uses ar to extract the first set of debs.
i even get those errors if I just 'unpack' the image, and re-assemble
it, without changing any .deb or .udeb.
as the initrd.gz is also unchanged, i
Daniel Baumann wrote:
> I only updated /dists/etch/Release, which one did I miss?
as said on irc, the arch Release file in
/dists/etch/main/binary-*/Release do not need to be changed, and have no
influence to this bug anyway.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberi
Neale Banks wrote:
> May 18 00:29:38 debootstrap:
> /target/var/lib/apt/lists/debootstrap.invalid_dists_etch_main_binary-i386_Packages:
> No such file or directory
> May 18 00:29:38 debootstrap:
> /target/var/lib/apt/lists/debootstrap.invalid_dists_etch_main_binary-i386_Packages:
> No such file
Joey Hess wrote:
> You do know there are two separate Release files that need to be
> updated?
I only updated /dists/etch/Release, which one did I miss?
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://people.panther
Daniel Baumann wrote:
> same problem here, but *with* updated (and correct) Release file.
You do know there are two separate Release files that need to be
updated?
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Friday 18 May 2007 17:54, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Frans Pop wrote:
> > If you change the Packages file, you also need to update the md5sum
> > and size in the Release file.
>
> same problem here, but *with* updated (and correct) Release file.
>
> would it be of any help uploading a sample iso?
Frans Pop wrote:
> If you change the Packages file, you also need to update the md5sum and
> size in the Release file.
same problem here, but *with* updated (and correct) Release file.
would it be of any help uploading a sample iso?
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-456
On Friday 18 May 2007 04:53, Neale Banks wrote:
> But... I added a few more debs to the pool and rebuilt Packages[.gz]
> with apt-ftparchive - now debootstrap complains:
If you change the Packages file, you also need to update the md5sum and
size in the Release file.
pgplb5BSfm8zx.pgp
Descripti
Hi,
I've been, mostly successfully, customising the etch Netinst with
preseeding.
But... I added a few more debs to the pool and rebuilt Packages[.gz] with
apt-ftparchive - now debootstrap complains:
"Warning: file:///cdrom/dists/etc/main/binary-i386/Packages.gz was corrupt"
and
"Warning: file://
14 matches
Mail list logo
