On Wed, 16 May 2018 13:53:11 +0200
Paul Gevers wrote:
> > This is due to #898738.
>
> Thanks for picking this up, but why then didn't it fail with debootstrap
> 1.0.97¹ as the bug suggests that version had the same issue.
Hmm, it seems that runs fine again with debootstrap 1.0.99
https://ci.de
Paul Gevers (2018-05-16):
> Hi Luca,
>
> On 16-05-18 13:33, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> > 2018-05-16 10:05 GMT+02:00 Paul Gevers :
> >> The autopkgtest of debomatic in testing is apparently already broken¹
> >> without the new debootstrap for reasons unclear to me. As a result it
> >> isn't blocking
Hi Luca,
On 16-05-18 13:33, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> 2018-05-16 10:05 GMT+02:00 Paul Gevers :
>> The autopkgtest of debomatic in testing is apparently already broken¹
>> without the new debootstrap for reasons unclear to me. As a result it
>> isn't blocking migration anymore².
>
> This is due to #
Hi Paul,
2018-05-16 10:05 GMT+02:00 Paul Gevers :
> The autopkgtest of debomatic in testing is apparently already broken¹
> without the new debootstrap for reasons unclear to me. As a result it
> isn't blocking migration anymore².
This is due to #898738.
--
Cheers,
Luca
Hi all,
On 15-05-18 15:11, Paul Gevers wrote:
> tl;dr: debootstrap/1.0.98 breaks debomatic/0.23-1 autopkgtest in testing
> see: https://ci.debian.net/packages/d/debomatic/testing/amd64/
The autopkgtest of debomatic in testing is apparently already broken¹
without the new debootstrap for r
5 matches
Mail list logo
