Re: debiandoc-sgml and Russian, Polish

2000-08-13 Thread Ardo van Rangelrooij
Adam Di Carlo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Ardo van Rangelrooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Adam Di Carlo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > > > > As I understand it, we need the woody debiandoc-sgml pakcage in order > > > to build Russian and Polish installation manual and release notes > >

Re: debiandoc-sgml and Russian, Polish

2000-08-13 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Ardo van Rangelrooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Adam Di Carlo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > > As I understand it, we need the woody debiandoc-sgml pakcage in order > > to build Russian and Polish installation manual and release notes > > (assuming they are otherwise ok), correct? > > For

Re: debiandoc-sgml and Russian, Polish

2000-08-13 Thread Ardo van Rangelrooij
Adam Di Carlo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > As I understand it, we need the woody debiandoc-sgml pakcage in order > to build Russian and Polish installation manual and release notes > (assuming they are otherwise ok), correct? For Polish yes, for Russian I'm not aware of any changes made since

debiandoc-sgml and Russian, Polish

2000-08-12 Thread Adam Di Carlo
As I understand it, we need the woody debiandoc-sgml pakcage in order to build Russian and Polish installation manual and release notes (assuming they are otherwise ok), correct? It's a little annoying to be in the situation again where for frozen or stable updates we need stuff from woody. Do