On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 02:02:49AM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> AFAIH vt102 supports latin1, so most "vt100-comaptible" terminals
> should be suitable for western european languages.
vt100 terminals are not "dumb".
Bastian
--
Humans do claim a great deal for that particular emotion (love).
elijah wright wrote:
>
> > > - cdebconf should not use translated strings on dumb terminals.
> >
> > Can you tell why? I know nothing about dumb terminals, googled a bit
> > but did not find anything interesting. This is not d-i related, but
> > #232296 discusses whether English text could contai
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 09:49:04PM -0600, elijah wright wrote:
> dumb terminals, at least in the US, are ascii-only. no clue whether
> anyone ever manufactured terminals that did non-roman-alphabetic or
> non-ascii characters. i would think "maybe", but i don't know for sure.
At least not this s
> > - cdebconf should not use translated strings on dumb terminals.
>
> Can you tell why? I know nothing about dumb terminals, googled a bit
> but did not find anything interesting. This is not d-i related, but
> #232296 discusses whether English text could contain UTF-8 encoded
> non-ASCII chara
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 09:00:56PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> hi folks
Hi Bastian,
> i do some work on the s390 port and see the following not realy bugs:
> - cdebconf uses \r for the progress bar which the terminal don't
> support, it looks like this:
> |Y 1.5%" Y 1.5%" Unpacking auto
hi folks
i do some work on the s390 port and see the following not realy bugs:
- cdebconf uses \r for the progress bar which the terminal don't
support, it looks like this:
|Y 1.5%" Y 1.5%" Unpacking autopartkit
| Y 3.0%" Y 3.0%" Retrieving base-installer
|
6 matches
Mail list logo
