Re: debian-installer - devfs

2002-10-27 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[John H. Robinson] > i have found even more interesting results (with lvm, actually) when > you mount defvs onto /devices and leave /dev as a ``normal'' > filesystem What happens then? I have problems initializing LVM on SCSI machines. Could this solve it? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PR

Re: debian-installer - devfs

2002-09-29 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
* Bastian Blank | On Sat, Sep 28, 2002 at 07:09:00AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: | > * Bastian Blank | > | debian-installer is using kernel 2.4 by default. why it doesn't use | > | devfs to safe some initrd space? | > it does. | | why is dev filed with a bunch of devices? because nobody has

Re: debian-installer - devfs

2002-09-28 Thread Geert Stappers
At 11:39 +0200 9/28/02, Alexander Koch wrote: >On Sat, 28 September 2002 09:30:58 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: >> why is dev filed with a bunch of devices? > >As we are on it, how do you convince devfsd to create hda10, >too? I had to put this in the devfs init script. Heh, it >works... I gave up a

Re: debian-installer - devfs

2002-09-28 Thread Alexander Koch
On Sat, 28 September 2002 09:30:58 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > why is dev filed with a bunch of devices? As we are on it, how do you convince devfsd to create hda10, too? I had to put this in the devfs init script. Heh, it works... I gave up after 15 minutes of reading the howto stuff and all t

Re: debian-installer - devfs

2002-09-28 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sat, Sep 28, 2002 at 07:09:00AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > * Bastian Blank > | debian-installer is using kernel 2.4 by default. why it doesn't use > | devfs to safe some initrd space? > it does. why is dev filed with a bunch of devices? bastian -- Vulcans never bluff.

Re: debian-installer - devfs

2002-09-27 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
* Bastian Blank | debian-installer is using kernel 2.4 by default. why it doesn't use | devfs to safe some initrd space? it does. -- Tollef Fog Heen,''`. UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' :

Re: debian-installer - devfs

2002-09-27 Thread Joey Hess
John H. Robinson, IV wrote: > mingetty allocated the first terminal, no problem. any second and > subsequent totaly failed. agetty was able to allocate two or more > terminals. Yes, that is bug #81275. 2-year-old patch included in that bug report. Paul, could you take a look at that since it seem

Re: debian-installer - devfs

2002-09-27 Thread John H. Robinson, IV
Bastian Blank wrote: > On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 10:27:17AM -0700, John H. Robinson, IV wrote: > > > > mingetty allocated the first terminal, no problem. any second and > > subsequent totaly failed. > > do you have devfsd installed and/or yes > use /dev/ttyX instead of /dev/console/X? i made n

Re: debian-installer - devfs

2002-09-27 Thread Bastian Blank
On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 10:27:17AM -0700, John H. Robinson, IV wrote: > i had just the opposite experience: > > mingetty allocated the first terminal, no problem. any second and > subsequent totaly failed. do you have devfsd installed and/or use /dev/ttyX instead of /dev/console/X? bastian --

Re: debian-installer - devfs

2002-09-27 Thread John H. Robinson, IV
Bastian Blank wrote: > On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 10:18:46AM -0700, John H. Robinson, IV wrote: > > there are a couple of applications that i am aware of that do not get > > along with devfs very well. (wmppp and mingetty being two of them). > > mingetty works fine with devfs, while getty wont. othe

Re: debian-installer - devfs

2002-09-27 Thread Bastian Blank
On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 10:18:46AM -0700, John H. Robinson, IV wrote: > there are a couple of applications that i am aware of that do not get > along with devfs very well. (wmppp and mingetty being two of them). mingetty works fine with devfs, while getty wont. other software can be fixed. basti

Re: debian-installer - devfs

2002-09-27 Thread John H. Robinson, IV
Bastian Blank wrote: > > devfs is marked as stable within 2.4.x, also there are problems with > not devfs-capable drivers (i don't find any the since several months). there are a couple of applications that i am aware of that do not get along with devfs very well. (wmppp and mingetty being two o

Re: debian-installer - devfs

2002-09-27 Thread Bastian Blank
On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 06:54:01PM +0200, Romuald DELAVERGNE wrote: > Perhaps devfs is not really integrated in the 2.4 which is a transition > for this new filesystem. devfs is marked as stable within 2.4.x, also there are problems with not devfs-capable drivers (i don't find any the since seve

Re: debian-installer - devfs

2002-09-27 Thread Romuald DELAVERGNE
Le 2002.09.27 18:38, Bastian Blank a écrit : > hi folks > > debian-installer is using kernel 2.4 by default. why it doesn't use > devfs to safe some initrd space? > Device files consumes only inodes but not really much disk space. But you are right, devfs should be better. Perhaps devfs is not

debian-installer - devfs

2002-09-27 Thread Bastian Blank
hi folks debian-installer is using kernel 2.4 by default. why it doesn't use devfs to safe some initrd space? bastian -- Earth -- mother of the most beautiful women in the universe. -- Apollo, "Who Mourns for Adonais?" stardate 3468.1 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTE