Hector Oron dixit:
>If you have kernel flavours, then you probably want to have
>subarch support for m68k (similar to armel).
I don’t know. Do we have kernel flavours? The -atari, -amiga,
etc. are like -i486 and -i686-pae kernels.
>If you need any update, please send a patch with updated
>inform
Hello,
Sorry for late reply, I have just found this email in my records.
Just note that this email call for update, was related to Squeeze
release.
2011/5/8 Thorsten Glaser :
> The packages are linux-image-2.6.38-2-{amiga,atari,…}
> versioned as *_2.6.38-5_m68k.deb (I don’t know which
> of these
Hector Oron dixit:
>(CC me on replies as I might not be subscribed to this list)
Done.
> On SH4, m68k and alpha architecture, as those are not Debian
>"Official" candidates for release, debian-installer is lagging kernel
>behind.
>
>d-i/installer/doc/devel/kerntabl:
>arch kernel udebs
Hello,
2011/1/10 Thorsten Glaser :
> Hector Oron dixit:
>
>>d-i/installer/doc/devel/kerntabl:
>>arch kernel udebs build/config
>>i386 2.6.32 (-27) 2.6.32-5
>>[...]
>>alpha 2.6.30 (-6) 2.6.30-1 # unoficial
>>m68k 2.6.26 (-7) 2.6.26-1 # unoficial
>>sh4
Hector Oron dixit:
>m68k 2.6.26 (-7) 2.6.26-1 # unoficial
I’ve got working 2.6.32-26+m68k.2 which I uploaded to unreleased on
debian-ports.org yesterday, and 2.6.32-27+m68k.3 is almost built.
The kernels for m68k sort of need patches to build which, at the
current time, will probably n
5 matches
Mail list logo
