Quoting Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl):
> [2] Note that this IMO implies cdebconf also gets dropped from the master
> PO files and thus gets translation handling like any regular Debian
> package.
That can be done. At least from my l10n POV.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Friday 25 September 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl):
> > - partman components are very tightly coupled
> > Very frequently changes, such as adding ext4 support, requires
> > making related changes to multiple components. Being able to do so in
> > a singl
Quoting Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl):
(only a few comments here and there)
> - partman components are very tightly coupled
> Very frequently changes, such as adding ext4 support, requires making
> related changes to multiple components. Being able to do so in a single
> branch in a single
Let me start with a request to other team members: PLEASE join this
discussion. Think about how *you* use the repository; consider whether you
are confortable with git or not; think about the issues raised both by
Joey and me; and *give your opinion*.
I hate the fact that this looks to be turni
Frans Pop wrote:
> crazy
> butt ugly
> insane
> reeks
> can't be bothered to do a proper migration
Well, I think we know how you feel about this. But, the presence of the
above words makes it much more difficult to write a friendly, reasoned,
objective, non-defensive reply.
> Given the team meeti
Given the team meeting this evening I guess this is my last chance to
comment. The main reason I haven't so far is that I find myself simply
caring less and less, but well.
I really have only one argument against the switch to git: the splitting of
the repository into multiple separate reposito
On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 10:06 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 September 2009, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > One issue I had with debmirror in the past (with nobody to complain
> > to ;-))
>
> Hmmm? Never heard of the BTS? ;-)
Fair point ;-) I just never quite got round to it when there seemed to
On Tuesday 08 September 2009, Ian Campbell wrote:
> One issue I had with debmirror in the past (with nobody to complain
> to ;-))
Hmmm? Never heard of the BTS? ;-)
> was that I wanted a partial mirror of main+contrib of testing
> but just main/debian-installer of sid. I wanted this so that I can
On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 23:51 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> [1] Which now supports mirroring everything needed to to create CD
> images using debian-cd, including (released) D-I images and the "docs"
> and "tools" directories :-)
One issue I had with debmirror in the past (with nobody to complain
to ;-)
On Tuesday 08 September 2009, Lee Winter wrote:
> > [1] Which now supports mirroring everything needed to to create CD
> > images using debian-cd, including (released) D-I images and the
> > "docs" and "tools" directories :-)
>
> Would you please describe what is left that the new version of
> debm
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Frans Pop wrote:
...
> ... debmirror[1] ...
...
> [1] Which now supports mirroring everything needed to to create CD images
>using debian-cd, including (released) D-I images and the "docs" and
>"tools" directories :-)
Would you please describe what is left
On Monday 07 September 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Have you made some progress here? During the team meeting today, there
> is a rough consensus that we should move on but all of us agreed that
> you could have interesting comments and, even if they aren't as
> polished as you would like to, i
Quoting Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl):
> > We discussed switching to git at DebConf, and came up with a compromise
> > plan that seemed reasonable to all in attendance[1]: Split each d-i
> > package into its own git repository[2], but leave the manual[3] and
> > packages/po[4] in svn. Investigate
On Thursday 13 August 2009, Joey Hess wrote:
> We discussed switching to git at DebConf, and came up with a compromise
> plan that seemed reasonable to all in attendance[1]: Split each d-i
> package into its own git repository[2], but leave the manual[3] and
> packages/po[4] in svn. Investigate usi
Joey Hess wrote:
> Remove $Id$ keywords from all files that have them; git doesn't
> support that. (Do after conversion)
git supports $Id$; you just have to explicitly request it, as you do
with svn (using svn:keywords). Quoting the gitattributes(5) manpage:
> ident
> When the att
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 08:49:50PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> We discussed switching to git at DebConf, and came up with a compromise
> plan that seemed reasonable to all in attendance[1]: Split each d-i
> package into its own git repository[2], but leave the manual[3] and
> packages/po[4] in svn. I
We discussed switching to git at DebConf, and came up with a compromise
plan that seemed reasonable to all in attendance[1]: Split each d-i
package into its own git repository[2], but leave the manual[3] and
packages/po[4] in svn. Investigate using submodules[6] and/or mr
to tie the git repositorie
17 matches
Mail list logo
