Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 01:06:00PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > > - e2fsprogs-udeb, mkreiserfs-udeb, xfsprogs-udeb: needs to be pulled
> > > > in via dependencies.
> >
> > Need to, but are not, by partman-xfs and partman-reiserfs at least.
>
On Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 01:06:00PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > - e2fsprogs-udeb, mkreiserfs-udeb, xfsprogs-udeb: needs to be pulled
> > > in via dependencies.
>
> Need to, but are not, by partman-xfs and partman-reiserfs at least.
partman-ext3, partman-reiserfs and
Bastian Blank wrote:
> > - e2fsprogs-udeb, mkreiserfs-udeb, xfsprogs-udeb: needs to be pulled
> > in via dependencies.
Need to, but are not, by partman-xfs and partman-reiserfs at least.
Rest look ok.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
I will request the following changes today:
On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 11:59:00AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> - priority changes to optional
> - libuuid1-udeb, debootstrap-udeb, libblkid1-udeb
> - baseconfig-udeb: experts only
> - e2fsprogs-udeb, mkreiserfs-udeb, xfsprogs-udeb: needs to be pu
On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 09:11:25PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 09:51:30AM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > > Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 01:49:16AM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > > > > > - partconf: deprecated and have no a
Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 09:51:30AM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 01:49:16AM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > > > > - partconf: deprecated and have no additional support over partman
> > > > > - partitioner
> > > > At least
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 238363 -1
Bug#238363: Doesn't handle properly dvh disk labels (mips)
Bug 238363 cloned as bug 239371.
> reassign -1 parted
Bug#239371: Doesn't handle properly dvh disk labels (mips)
Bug reassigned from package `partman' to `parted'.
> clone 2382
clone 238363 -1
reassign -1 parted
clone 238251 -2
reassign -2 parted
retitle -2 [dvh] Doesn't create the partitions with the proper partition numbers (#9
for SGI vol. header) and partition type (83 for Linux, ext2)
merge -1 -2
thanks
On 22.III.2004 at 13:54 Sven Luther wrote:
>
> Do you have
On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 09:51:30AM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 01:49:16AM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > > > - partconf: deprecated and have no additional support over partman
> > > > - partitioner
> > > At least arm, mips and probably mipsel
mån 2004-03-22 klockan 11.34 skrev Thiemo Seufer:
> > OK, so if some arches will be using partconf -- what needs to be done?
>
> Well, the best fix is to improve partman to do the job well, but that
> takes probably more time than we have for sarge.
I'm wondering if parts of partman could be rewr
Martin Sjögren wrote:
> mån 2004-03-22 klockan 09.51 skrev Thiemo Seufer:
> > Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 01:49:16AM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > > > > - partconf: deprecated and have no additional support over partman
> > > > > - partitioner
> > > > At least arm, mips
mån 2004-03-22 klockan 09.51 skrev Thiemo Seufer:
> Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 01:49:16AM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > > > - partconf: deprecated and have no additional support over partman
> > > > - partitioner
> > > At least arm, mips and probably mipsel will continue
Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 01:49:16AM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > > - partconf: deprecated and have no additional support over partman
> > > - partitioner
> > At least arm, mips and probably mipsel will continue to use it, because
> > partman is to slow and doesn't suppo
On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 01:49:16AM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > - partconf: deprecated and have no additional support over partman
> > - partitioner
> At least arm, mips and probably mipsel will continue to use it, because
> partman is to slow and doesn't support some of the disk label forma
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 05:20:43PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> The following priorities are currently wrong:
> - hw-detect(-full): must be lower as only usable on some arches.
> - usb-discover: pulled in via dependencies.
> - userdevfs: should never automaticaly installed.
> - libuuid1-udeb, debo
Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 06:27:28PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > Any of this changes can be delayed after the release.
>
> So, now its time to fix the issues
> - priority changes to optional
[snip]
> - partconf: deprecated and have no additional support over partman
>
[Bastian Blank]
> - autopartkit: deprecated (AFAIK)
Actively used by debian-edu. Not depricated.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 06:27:28PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Any of this changes can be delayed after the release.
So, now its time to fix the issues
- priority changes to optional
- hw-detect, hw-detect-full: alrady in the repository
- libuuid1-udeb, debootstrap-udeb, libblkid1-udeb
- l
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 12:13:55PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> I'm also considering downgrading baseconfig-udeb, since only experts
> should use it anyway. Also possibly autopartkit, for similar reasons,
> and to save memory.
The same with partitioner and the progs for the filesystems which can be
p
Bastian Blank wrote:
> The following priorities are currently wrong:
> - hw-detect(-full): must be lower as only usable on some arches.
Unless this causes install failures on some arches, I think it's too
complicated to get the dependencies just right to downgrade this before
the release. We would
Hi folks
The following priorities are currently wrong:
- hw-detect(-full): must be lower as only usable on some arches.
- usb-discover: pulled in via dependencies.
- userdevfs: should never automaticaly installed.
- libuuid1-udeb, debootstrap-udeb, libblkid1-udeb, libc-udeb:
pulled in via depen
21 matches
Mail list logo
