Aurelien Jarno (2024-12-28):
> Thanks for doing that. I do not have time to test that today, but looks
> good, riscv64 should not be different than other architectures.
[…]
> Yes, I confirm it makes sense.
Alright, the package built fine after the latest dinstall run (which put
the needed files i
Hi Cyril,
On 2024-12-28 02:26, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hello Aurélien,
>
> Let's pretend I know nothing about riscv64… I see you added support for
> it in debian-installer (thanks!) and the resulting images tarball
> includes netboot stuff, so I've staged the addition of a riscv64 package
> on t
Hello Aurélien,
Let's pretend I know nothing about riscv64… I see you added support for
it in debian-installer (thanks!) and the resulting images tarball
includes netboot stuff, so I've staged the addition of a riscv64 package
on the d-i-n-i side:
https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debian-
3 matches
Mail list logo