On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 10:47:43AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Package: kernel-image-sparc-2.4
> > Boot floppies should really get it's own set of local headers so it
> > doesn't have to include kernel headers. This will avoid the conflicts.
>
> Wh
David Whedon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Maybe I should do this? Looks ugly, but might not break ppc:
>
> Index: partbl_msdos.c
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/debian-boot/boot-floppies/utilities/libfdisk/partbl_msdos.c,v
> retrieving rev
Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Package: kernel-image-sparc-2.4
> Boot floppies should really get it's own set of local headers so it
> doesn't have to include kernel headers. This will avoid the conflicts.
Why kernel 2.4 though? Boot floppies mostly uses kernel 2.2 and every
arch use
Package: kernel-image-sparc-2.4
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 01:19:01AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
>
> I can't build the woody version on sparc:
>
>
> gcc -Wall -Os -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-builtin -c -o partbl_msdos.o partbl_msdos.c
> In file included from /usr/include/asm/string.h:11,
>
I may have been too hasty in fixing the sparc build failure. (see recent cvs
activity)
After further investigation I notice that I may have broken powerpc in the
process. Not having a powerpc machine to test on I don't know if that is the
case.
I'm looking for some input.
Here's the story:
T
I can't build the woody version on sparc:
gcc -Wall -Os -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-builtin -c -o partbl_msdos.o partbl_msdos.c
In file included from /usr/include/asm/string.h:11,
from /usr/include/linux/string.h:21,
from /usr/include/asm-sparc/unaligned.h:6,
6 matches
Mail list logo
