On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 01:28:43PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 08:30:35PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
>
> > I'd also like to discuss whether the default subvolume naming scheme
> > should follow Ubuntu, Fedora, OpenSUSE, or something else.
>
> What scheme are they usin
Thank you for the replies, and I'm so sorry this email is long. I had
also hoped that by taking time to think through the issues I would
place less of a "this email is so long and taking so much of my time!"
burden on everyone reading this thread.
On 27 April 2016 at 07:43, Philipp Kern wrote:
>
On 2016-04-23 23:51, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
Ubuntu avoids using the default subvolume (subvol ID 5). For the
rootfs their installer creates a subvol called @, for /home it creates
@home, etc. In fstab the device is specified and subvol=@ is added to
the mount option to specify which subvolum
On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 05:51:25PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> On 23 April 2016 at 07:38, New Thread old subject joining team
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 01:28:43PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> >> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 08:30:35PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> >>
> >> > I'd a
On 23 April 2016 at 07:38, New Thread old subject joining team
wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 01:28:43PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 08:30:35PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
>>
>> > I'd also like to discuss whether the default subvolume naming scheme
>> > should foll
On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 01:28:43PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 08:30:35PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
>
> > I'd also like to discuss whether the default subvolume naming scheme
> > should follow Ubuntu, Fedora, OpenSUSE, or something else.
>
> What scheme are they us
6 matches
Mail list logo
