Re: boot-floppies 3.0.21 for testing

2002-03-29 Thread Chris Tillman
On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 02:31:03PM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > "Rolf Brudeseth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Thanks for the feedback. I will limit this e-mail to CHRP machines. Before > > we get into the technical issues; my question is: Has there been a > > conscious decision to make Wood

Re: boot-floppies 3.0.21 for testing

2002-03-19 Thread Bob Van Cleef
SunBlade 100 failed - still no support for hme0 PCI card. Bob -- ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> Bob Van Cleef, Systems Administrator (408) 734-8100 MicroUnity, Inc. FAX (408) 734-8136 376 Martin Ave., Santa Clara, CA 95050

Re: boot-floppies 3.0.21 for testing

2002-03-16 Thread Joshua Uziel
* Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020316 14:25]: > It is a limitation in the firmware of the Ultra 5 line, possibly > ultra10 as well, not sure. The U5 and the U10 are practically the same machine with a different riser card and case. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a sub

Re: boot-floppies 3.0.21 for testing

2002-03-16 Thread Thomas J. Zeeman
On Sat, 16 Mar 2002, Joshua Uziel wrote: > * Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020316 10:25]: > > "Thomas J. Zeeman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I tried to do a floppy-install but for reasons I couldn't figure out, due > > > to a lack of working and accepted floppies, it failed on me. >

Re: boot-floppies 3.0.21 for testing

2002-03-16 Thread Joshua Uziel
* Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020316 10:25]: > "Thomas J. Zeeman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I tried to do a floppy-install but for reasons I couldn't figure out, due > > to a lack of working and accepted floppies, it failed on me. > > The tftpboot.img worked. No other options tried. >

Re: boot-floppies 3.0.21 for testing

2002-03-15 Thread David Kimdon
if so please file a bug against the sparc kernel-image package. Thanks, David Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 02:31:23PM +0100 wrote: > Hello > > Shouldn't the tulip driver in the sparc discs be compiled in the kernel > and not as a module? Netra X1 needs the tulip driver. > > /Torbjörn Olofsson > > >

Re: boot-floppies 3.0.21 for testing

2002-03-15 Thread Chris Tillman
On Sat, Mar 16, 2002 at 12:38:09AM +0100, Thomas J. Zeeman wrote: > > On Thu, 14 Mar 2002, Joshua Uziel wrote: > > > * Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020314 10:55]: > > > I have uploaded sparc and powerpc builds of boot-floppies 3.0.21 for > &

Re: boot-floppies 3.0.21 for testing

2002-03-15 Thread Thomas J. Zeeman
On Thu, 14 Mar 2002, Joshua Uziel wrote: > * Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020314 10:55]: > > I have uploaded sparc and powerpc builds of boot-floppies 3.0.21 for > > testing at: > > > > http://people.debian.org/~aph/debian/dists/woody/main/ Just curi

Re: boot-floppies 3.0.21 for testing

2002-03-15 Thread Emanuel Schmid
Hi Sorry for the trash I sent around the world before... this is what I wanted to send: > > Why both with nfs when the tftpboot.img has all you need? Just > > required tftp+rarp. > > > > As for the nfs options, I'll get them fixed in the next kernel upload. > > I wasn't able to get the tftpboo

Re: boot-floppies 3.0.21 for testing

2002-03-15 Thread Emanuel Schmid
On Thu, 14 Mar 2002 20:32:19 -0500 Dave Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 07:48:13PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote: > > > > Why both with nfs when the tftpboot.img has all you need? Just > > required tftp+rarp. > > > > As for the nfs options, I'll get them fixed in the next k

Re: boot-floppies 3.0.21 for testing

2002-03-15 Thread Torbjorn Olofsson
Hello Shouldn't the tulip driver in the sparc discs be compiled in the kernel and not as a module? Netra X1 needs the tulip driver. /Torbjörn Olofsson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: boot-floppies 3.0.21 for testing

2002-03-14 Thread Dave Baker
--EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 07:48:13PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote: > > Why both with nfs when the tftpboot.img has all you need? Just required > tftp+rarp. >=20 > As fo

Re: boot-floppies 3.0.21 for testing

2002-03-14 Thread Ben Collins
On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 04:58:11PM -0500, Dave Baker wrote: > On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 01:50:56PM -0800, Joshua Uziel wrote: > > * Dave Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020314 13:42]: > > > The sun4u kernel-config is missing CONFIG_ROOT_NFS and CONFIG_NFSD_TCP, > > > both of which are present in sun4cdm.

Re: boot-floppies 3.0.21 for testing

2002-03-14 Thread Joshua Uziel
* Dave Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020314 13:58]: > > Well, it'll break an NFS install, sure... but a network install works > > fine. I did one on an AX1105 just a little while ago (UltraSPARC-IIe). > > I chose my words poorly. My machines generally don't have floppy or cdrom > installed, so my

Re: boot-floppies 3.0.21 for testing

2002-03-14 Thread Dave Baker
On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 01:50:56PM -0800, Joshua Uziel wrote: > * Dave Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020314 13:42]: > > The sun4u kernel-config is missing CONFIG_ROOT_NFS and CONFIG_NFSD_TCP, > > both of which are present in sun4cdm. I believe this omission causes a > > network install to be impossi

Re: boot-floppies 3.0.21 for testing

2002-03-14 Thread Joshua Uziel
* Dave Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020314 13:42]: > The sun4u kernel-config is missing CONFIG_ROOT_NFS and CONFIG_NFSD_TCP, > both of which are present in sun4cdm. I believe this omission causes a > network install to be impossible on a sun4u machine (though if I'm > mistaken I'd be very happy to

VME PPC booting (was: boot-floppies 3.0.21 for testing)

2002-03-14 Thread Maitland Bottoms
Adam Di Carlo writes: > > I have uploaded sparc and powerpc builds of boot-floppies 3.0.21 for > testing at: > > http://people.debian.org/~aph/debian/dists/woody/main/ OK! Hmm. I have troubles with my Motorola MVME23xx card. When the bootfull.bin goes into the boot

Re: boot-floppies 3.0.21 for testing

2002-03-14 Thread Matt Kraai
On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 11:57:13AM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > I have uploaded sparc and powerpc builds of boot-floppies 3.0.21 for > testing at: > > http://people.debian.org/~aph/debian/dists/woody/main/ > > We need help! Our non-i386 testing is decidedly weak. Pl

Re: boot-floppies 3.0.21 for testing

2002-03-14 Thread Joshua Uziel
* Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020314 10:55]: > I have uploaded sparc and powerpc builds of boot-floppies 3.0.21 for > testing at: > > http://people.debian.org/~aph/debian/dists/woody/main/ > > We need help! Our non-i386 testing is decidedly weak. Please

Re: boot-floppies 3.0.21 for testing

2002-03-14 Thread Dave Baker
--opJtzjQTFsWo+cga Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 11:57:13AM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote: >=20 > I have uploaded sparc and powerpc builds of boot-floppies 3.0.21 for > testing