On Thu Oct 04, 2001 at 01:07:30AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> Erik Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > So Adam, is it agreeable that I upload a version of busybox to the
> > main archive with these changes? David has now validated that
> > this is viable and saves space.
>
> Yah. Go
Hi all!
On 5 Oct 2001, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> Yes, please don't try making a change to base like this at this point
> in the freeze. It's just going to have to be a problem we have in
> woody. busybox package needs to be tuned to boot-floppies use -- it
> might be inconvenient to others but we
> > earlier in this list it has been suggested to have a busybox-bf package in
> > addition to the normal busybox package. I would strongly encourage this,
> > though for different reasons:
> >
>
What you suggest sounds reasonable to me.
> I wonder if we could use the .udeb for this purpose? Ad
On Fri Oct 05, 2001 at 12:21:23AM +0200, Jens Ruehmkorf wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> > So Adam, is it agreeable that I upload a version of busybox to the
> > main archive with these changes? David has now validated that this is
> > viable and saves space.
>
> earlier in this list it has been suggested
Hi all,
> So Adam, is it agreeable that I upload a version of busybox to the
> main archive with these changes? David has now validated that this is
> viable and saves space.
earlier in this list it has been suggested to have a busybox-bf package in
addition to the normal busybox package. I wou
On Tue Oct 02, 2001 at 06:58:47PM -0700, David Kimdon wrote:
> I just completed an install with a reduced busybox. We are now using
> route and ifconfig from busybox (no bb ash, see below). Comparing new
> and old, mounted via loop.
>
> /home/dwhedon/new 3415 2501 914 74% /n
On Wed Oct 03, 2001 at 10:14:41AM -0600, Matt Kraai wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 11:25:42PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 06:58:47PM -0700, David Kimdon wrote:
> > > busybox route is in a different place from net-tools route, so I added
> > > a symlink, see patch below
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 11:25:42PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 06:58:47PM -0700, David Kimdon wrote:
> > busybox route is in a different place from net-tools route, so I added
> > a symlink, see patch below.
>
> fix busybox, don't kludge.
This is fixed in the upstream de
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 06:58:47PM -0700, David Kimdon wrote:
> busybox (1:0.60.1-5) unstable; urgency=low
>
> * turn on id and printf for boot-floppies
> * turn off ash for boot-floppies, it segfauls in debootstrap
>
> -- David Kimdon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tue, 2 Oct 2001 16:15:42 -0700
>
I just completed an install with a reduced busybox. We are now using
route and ifconfig from busybox (no bb ash, see below). Comparing new
and old, mounted via loop.
/home/dwhedon/new 3415 2501 914 74% /new
/home/dwhedon/old 3414 2634 780 78% /old
That's
10 matches
Mail list logo
