Bug#1108882: [debian-installer/pkgsel] hangs when choosing "Back" in popcon dialog

Package: pkgsel Severity: minor In the dialog asking if the user wants to install/use popcon, the installer hangs for ever, if you press the "Back" button. It goes back to "Preparing popularity-contest" or "Unpacking popularity-contest" and then hangs. Discovere

Bug#247220: marked as done (Not obvious that the item in the main partitioning menu goes back to the same screen)

Your message dated Fri, 22 Nov 2024 13:56:20 +0100 with message-id <20241122135620.9aa06bc1f5fe10c6c3ab3...@mailbox.org> and subject line Re: #247220 Not obvious that the item in the main partitioning menu goes back to the same screen has caused the Debian Bug report #247220, regardi

Bug#1032831: #1032831 broken loginscreen when switching virtual console forth and back to tty7 out of an active kde session

gt; > Comments/Problems: > > I did two new installations of debian 12 on two different laptops(listed > above), this > problem i have on both on them. > If i start my machine i get the normal login screen of sddm on tty7. > Then i can login and the kde loading screen start an

Processed: Re: #1032831 broken loginscreen when switching virtual console forth and back to tty7 out of an active kde session

Processing control commands: > reassign -1 sddm Bug #1032831 [installation-reports] broken loginscreen when switching virtual console forth and back to tty7 out of an active kde session Bug reassigned from package 'installation-reports' to 'sddm'. Ignoring request to alte

dose4udebs is back

[ bdrung and vorlon cc'd for information; DSA bcc'd for <3 ] Hi, dose4udebs was uncronned a while back, even if git doesn't show a specific reason for it (lots of live changes hadn't been committed when bubulle removed himself): https://salsa.debian.org/inst

mips64el daily builds (hopefully) back

Hi, For some reason, PATH wasn't set in the d-i user's crontab, missing /usr/local/bin for dd-schroot-cmd. (Dates back all the way to December when the eller → eberlin switch happened…) Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/> D-I

Bug#891009: debootstrap: wrongly falls back to https://deb.debian.org when try to create Ubuntu chroot

This should be fixed in the next release. https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debootstrap/-/commit/7e5923030e331f466ec1b56d875b023a274e9220 OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#1031643: bring hostname variable back

!= '(none)' ]; then + # the hostname has been set as boot param, bring it back here + hostname="$(hostname)" +fi + I am not familiar with the code, but from checking the installer console right at the beginning of the installation, this could work. Best regards, Andi

Bug#1032831: broken loginscreen when switching virtual console forth and back to tty7 out of an active kde session

fter that i have a normal kde session. But if i then change witch strg alt f2(for example) the virtual console and back to tty7 i am logged out of my active kde session and get a sddm login screen with a "pre-typed greyed" password.Its the same image just before the KDE loading screen ap

Found a back door

There are wireless back doors in computers in America that are inactive so they are stealth. It works on ip address 0.0.0.0, on port 0 You need to make it ease to edit firewall rules in the kernel.

Re: Bug#968091: Switching to another tty then back to tty1 in 20200808-3 netinst snapshot fails install

Hi, Job Bautista wrote (Sat, 08 Aug 2020 13:08:11 +): > Okay, I was still able to install the image successfully. > > Job Bautista so closing this bug Holger -- Holger Wansing PGP-Fingerprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508 3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076

Bug#968091: Switching to another tty then back to tty1 in 20200808-3 netinst snapshot fails install

signation: L1 Cache dmidecode: Configuration: Enabled, Not Socketed, Level 1 dmidecode: Operational Mode: Write Back dmidecode: Location: Internal dmidecode: Installed Size: 64 kB dmidecode: Maximum Size: 64 kB dmidecode: Supported SRAM Types: dmidecode: S

Bug#849508: marked as done (add GO BACK choice to save logs question)

Your message dated Fri, 7 Aug 2020 23:44:04 +0200 with message-id <20200807234404.35e377ed8bc47c218bcf5...@mailbox.org> and subject line Re: Mass-closing old installation-report bugs --- round 4 has caused the Debian Bug report #849508, regarding add GO BACK choice to save logs question

Bug#945772: marked as done (kernel-wedge: autopkgtest failure: +dpkg-architecture: warning: cannot determine CC system type, falling back to default (native compilation))

Your message dated Fri, 29 Nov 2019 18:34:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#945772: fixed in kernel-wedge 2.101 has caused the Debian Bug report #945772, regarding kernel-wedge: autopkgtest failure: +dpkg-architecture: warning: cannot determine CC system type, falling back to default

Bug#945772: kernel-wedge: autopkgtest failure: +dpkg-architecture: warning: cannot determine CC system type, falling back to default (native compilation)

type, falling back to default (native compilation) E: rc=0 I: Testing preprocess case excludemissing Files /dev/null and /tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.r3lmallz/downtmp/autopkgtest_tmp/excludemissing.err differ --- /dev/null 2019-11-10 04:27:02.357733355 + +++ /tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.r3lmallz/downtmp

Bug#924037: marked as done (Please add anacron back to task-desktop and task-laptop)

Your message dated Sun, 10 Mar 2019 22:34:55 + with message-id and subject line Bug#924037: fixed in tasksel 3.51 has caused the Debian Bug report #924037, regarding Please add anacron back to task-desktop and task-laptop to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Processed: Re: Bug#924037: Please add anacron back to task-desktop and task-laptop

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #924037 [task-desktop] Please add anacron back to task-desktop and task-laptop Added tag(s) pending. -- 924037: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=924037 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#924037: Please add anacron back to task-desktop and task-laptop

Control: tags -1 + pending Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Hi Holger, > > Holger Wansing (2019-03-08): > > Since this is just a revert of a recent change, this can be considered > > causing no harm. > > > > Any objections? > > kibi? > > Sure, a revert looks good indeed; thanks! Just committed. Tag

Bug#924037: Please add anacron back to task-desktop and task-laptop

Hi Holger, Holger Wansing (2019-03-08): > Since this is just a revert of a recent change, this can be considered > causing no harm. > > Any objections? > kibi? Sure, a revert looks good indeed; thanks! Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org) D-I release

Bug#924037: Please add anacron back to task-desktop and task-laptop

On 3/8/2019 7:17 PM, Holger Wansing wrote: > Hi, > > Ian Jackson wrote: >> Package: task-desktop >> Version: 3.49 >> >> The rationale for this change is IMO not correct. >> >> Michael Biebl wrote: >> | all important cron jobs have a corresponding .timer unit >> >> This is not a sufficient conditi

Bug#924037: Please add anacron back to task-desktop and task-laptop

Hi, Ian Jackson wrote: > Package: task-desktop > Version: 3.49 > > The rationale for this change is IMO not correct. > > Michael Biebl wrote: > | all important cron jobs have a corresponding .timer unit > > This is not a sufficient condition. Firstly, it is necessary for all > cron jobs, not

Bug#924037: Please add anacron back to task-desktop and task-laptop

Package: task-desktop Version: 3.49 The rationale for this change is IMO not correct. Michael Biebl wrote: | all important cron jobs have a corresponding .timer unit This is not a sufficient condition. Firstly, it is necessary for all cron jobs, not just ones considered `important', to have a

Bug#914605: marked as done (task-japanese-gnome-desktop: Icedove is now back to Thunderbird)

Your message dated Tue, 25 Dec 2018 20:41:21 + with message-id and subject line Bug#914605: fixed in tasksel 3.49 has caused the Debian Bug report #914605, regarding task-japanese-gnome-desktop: Icedove is now back to Thunderbird to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Processed: Re: Bug#914605: task-japanese-gnome-desktop: Icedove is now back to Thunderbird

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #914605 [task-japanese-gnome-desktop] task-japanese-gnome-desktop: Icedove is now back to Thunderbird Added tag(s) pending. -- 914605: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=914605 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#914605: task-japanese-gnome-desktop: Icedove is now back to Thunderbird

Control: tags -1 + pending Tetsutaro KAWADA wrote: > Package: task-japanese-gnome-desktop > Version: 3.48 > Severity: normal > > Dear Maintainer, > > Icedove is now back to Thunderbird. Committed to GIT. Thanks for the patch. Tagging this bug as pending -- Holger Wan

Bug#914605: task-japanese-gnome-desktop: Icedove is now back to Thunderbird

Package: task-japanese-gnome-desktop Version: 3.48 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, Icedove is now back to Thunderbird. -- System Information: Debian Release: buster/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: am

Bug#911750: marked as done (Race condition in d-i leading to kernel from security.debian.org to be kept back)

Your message dated Sun, 04 Nov 2018 20:40:34 + with message-id and subject line Bug#908711: fixed in pkgsel 0.45+deb9u2 has caused the Debian Bug report #908711, regarding Race condition in d-i leading to kernel from security.debian.org to be kept back to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#911750: marked as done (Race condition in d-i leading to kernel from security.debian.org to be kept back)

Your message dated Sat, 27 Oct 2018 22:34:16 + with message-id and subject line Bug#908711: fixed in pkgsel 0.61 has caused the Debian Bug report #908711, regarding Race condition in d-i leading to kernel from security.debian.org to be kept back to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#911750: Race condition in d-i leading to kernel from security.debian.org to be kept back

e- is found in one of those > > > newly available repositories (security.debian.org in this case), it's > > > not installed because APT refuses to install the recommended packages > > > (firware-linux-free, irqbalance) to satisfy dependencies, so the kernel > >

Bug#911750: Race condition in d-i leading to kernel from security.debian.org to be kept back

27;s >> not installed because APT refuses to install the recommended packages >> (firware-linux-free, irqbalance) to satisfy dependencies, so the kernel >> metapackage is kept back. > > I'm fairly sure it's the ABI bump in the kernel that prevents > upgradi

Bug#911750: Race condition in d-i leading to kernel from security.debian.org to be kept back

runs an upgrade; > but if a newer version of linux-image- is found in one of those > newly available repositories (security.debian.org in this case), it's > not installed because APT refuses to install the recommended packages > (firware-linux-free, irqbalance) to satisfy dependencie

Bug#911750: Race condition in d-i leading to kernel from security.debian.org to be kept back

ories (security.debian.org in this case), it's not installed because APT refuses to install the recommended packages (firware-linux-free, irqbalance) to satisfy dependencies, so the kernel metapackage is kept back. It won't be installed until the admin runs an upgrade manually, once the system is booted.

Bug#891009: debootstrap: wrongly falls back to https://deb.debian.org when try to create Ubuntu chroot

On Wed, 21 Feb 2018 22:31:02 +0900 Hideki Yamane wrote: > And, https assures only secure *connection*, not integrity of *contents* > as GPG does, so this behavior is not good, IMO. As I said above, what https ensures and gpg does is different, and "if there's no reliable keyring then fallback

Bug#775444: marked as done (Issue warning if falling back to sha1)

Your message dated Sat, 07 Apr 2018 15:21:07 + with message-id and subject line Bug#775444: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.96 has caused the Debian Bug report #775444, regarding Issue warning if falling back to sha1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#891009: debootstrap: wrongly falls back to https://deb.debian.org when try to create Ubuntu chroot

Package: debootstrap Severity: normal Vesrion: 1.0.56 Hi, If you try "debootstrap ", it automatically falls back to pre-defined HTTPS mirror. > keyring () { > if [ -z "$KEYRING" ]; then > if [ -e "$1" ]; the

Bug#867571: debian-installer: unexpected behaviour when "Back" selected on task selection screen (netinst, expert)

Package: debian-installer Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, I'm performing an expert-mode non-graphical install from the stretch d-i netinst ISO. I've got as far as the task selection screen. I deselected everything (including standard system utilities) and selected "Back" r

Bug#861573: debian-installer: function 'go-back' broken

b" package. When it asks to configure it, it just go back to that step (after choose lang), but it doesnt do anything, then jump up to the "previous" next step. The issue start to be important during settings of hard disk. I've chosen dm- crypt in pack to load. When I setup a part

Bug#849508: add GO BACK choice to save logs question

Package: installation-reports Using DISTRIB_RELEASE="9 (stretch) - installer build 20161212-00:04" when getting to the question about saving logs, the user is prompted with /mnt . At this point the user wants to GO BACK to choose "open a shell" to inspect what places

UEFI Secure Boot back-door keys leak

"Either way, it'd be impossible in practise for MS to revoke every bootmgr earlier than a certain point, as they'd break install media, recovery partitions, backups, etc." https://rol.im/securegoldenkeyboot/ Best Professional Regards. -- Jose R R http://metztli.it -

Bug#584752: marked as done (debian-installer: "GO BACK" not working if harddisk mounted)

Your message dated Tue, 28 Jun 2016 15:41:46 +0200 with message-id <20160628154146.647ef54e@sylvester.codehelp> and subject line Re: Bug#584752: same for keymap selection has caused the Debian Bug report #584752, regarding debian-installer: "GO BACK" not working if harddisk mounted

Bug#822353: marked as done ([keyboard-configuration] update-rc.d: warning: start and stop actions are no longer supported; falling back to defaults)

Your message dated Sun, 24 Apr 2016 00:59:54 +0300 with message-id <20160423215954.ge14...@debian.lan> and subject line Re: Bug#822353: [keyboard-configuration] update-rc.d: warning: start and stop actions are no longer supported; falling back to defaults has caused the Debian Bug report #

Bug#822353: [keyboard-configuration] update-rc.d: warning: start and stop actions are no longer supported; falling back to defaults

Package: keyboard-configuration Version: 1.123 Severity: normal #dpkg-reconfigure keyboard-configuration ... update-rc.d: warning: start and stop actions are no longer supported; falling back to defaults https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2013/05/msg01109.html

Re: Merging libnss-dns-udeb and libnss-files-udeb back into libc6-udeb

On 2016-03-13 02:26, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Hi, > > For historical reason, disk space on boot floppies, the libnss_dns.so.2 > and libnss_files.so.2 libraries are in separate udeb packages, namely > libnss-dns-udeb and libnss-files-udeb. This is not the case of the deb > package, where everything

Re: Merging libnss-dns-udeb and libnss-files-udeb back into libc6-udeb

bresolv library which is in libc6-udeb. The recent CVE-2015-7547 has > shown that, and Ubuntu hit a bug by having the two out of sync in their > installer [1]. We would have got the same if debian-installer was pulling > its udeb from debian-security. > > That's why I would li

Merging libnss-dns-udeb and libnss-files-udeb back into libc6-udeb

having the two out of sync in their installer [1]. We would have got the same if debian-installer was pulling its udeb from debian-security. That's why I would like to propose to merge back libnss-dns-udeb and libnss-files-udeb back into libc6-udeb. The idea is to make libc6-udeb to provide the

Bug#266702: marked as done (want development task back)

Your message dated Sat, 9 May 2015 00:25:11 +0200 with message-id <20150508222511.ga12...@mraw.org> and subject line Re: Bug#266702: tasksel: want development task back has caused the Debian Bug report #266702, regarding want development task back to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#759657: console-setup: problem back

Package: console-setup Version: 1.123 Followup-For: Bug #759657 This problem is back: it hasn't happened since I added the wait4udev thing but today it came back. Karsten -- System Information: Debian Release: 8.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500,

Bug#775444: Issue warning if falling back to sha1

Package: debootstrap Tags: security patch Patch attached to output warning if falling back to sha1. commit 0911f1a8ba757a013e4c97e017634eb0ab746997 Author: jnqnfe Date: Thu Jan 15 19:22:17 2015 + Issue warning if having to fall back to sha1 diff --git a/debootstrap b/debootstrap

Processed: Re: Bug#770525: tasksel: Task selection menu does not have "Go Back" button

Processing control commands: > reassign -1 tasksel Bug #770525 [pkgsel] pkgsel: Task selection menu does not have "Go Back" button Bug reassigned from package 'pkgsel' to 'tasksel'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #770525 to the same values p

Re: Bug#770525: tasksel: Task selection menu does not have "Go Back" button

Control: reassign -1 tasksel Control: retitle -1 tasksel: Task selection menu does not have "Go Back" button Samuel Thibault, le Sat 22 Nov 2014 02:43:54 +0100, a écrit : > Samuel Thibault, le Sat 22 Nov 2014 02:34:40 +0100, a écrit : > > Package: tasksel > > Oops, sorry

Processed: Re: Bug#770525: pkgsel: Task selection menu does not have "Go Back" button

Processing control commands: > reassign -1 pkgsel Bug #770525 [tasksel] tasksel: Task selection menu does not have "Go Back" button Bug reassigned from package 'tasksel' to 'pkgsel'. No longer marked as found in versions tasksel/3.29. Ignoring request to alter

Re: Bug#770525: pkgsel: Task selection menu does not have "Go Back" button

Control: reassign -1 pkgsel Control: retitle -1 pkgsel: Task selection menu does not have "Go Back" button Samuel Thibault, le Sat 22 Nov 2014 02:34:40 +0100, a écrit : > Package: tasksel Oops, sorry, I'm just realizing that in d-i it's called pkgsel. Samuel -- T

Bug#770525: tasksel: Task selection menu does not have "Go Back" button

Package: tasksel Version: 3.29 Severity: normal Hello, The "Software selection" d-i dialog does not have a "Go Back" button any more, which is not convenient when one wants to tinker a bit debconf before starting the long "installing tasks" step. Samuel -- Syst

(almost) all daily builds back to successful!

he daily aggregator (responsible for building up the overview page[3]), and mail notifications based on that page should come back as well as a consequence. [Oops, I've actually too slow typing this mail, a notification went in already; cdimage-logs should look better next time.] 3. http://d-i.de

Bug#600428: marked as done (trouble going back and forth in installation steps)

Your message dated Sat, 31 Aug 2013 00:24:06 +0200 with message-id <201308310024.32985.hol...@layer-acht.org> and subject line dealing with old installation-reports has caused the Debian Bug report #600428, regarding trouble going back and forth in installation steps to be marked as done.

Re: [Pkg-sysvinit-devel] installation-manual: Should it suggests to switch to run level 1 and back?

Petter Reinholdtsen, le Thu 18 Apr 2013 06:30:58 +0200, a écrit : > [Samuel Thibault] > > Which way? Do you think we can still provide a recipe to manage to > > get the system booted, or should we forget about it and tell the > > user to just fix the issue and reboot? > > I suspect it is best to

Re: [Pkg-sysvinit-devel] installation-manual: Should it suggests to switch to run level 1 and back?

in many installations, switching > to runlevel 1 and back will work. There's networking: it may start deamons that are required for the connection to remain operational in the medium/long term (dhcp-client, wpa-supplicant, etc). These are all killed and not restarted when you switch to r

Re: [Pkg-sysvinit-devel] installation-manual: Should it suggests to switch to run level 1 and back?

[Samuel Thibault] > Which way? Do you think we can still provide a recipe to manage to > get the system booted, or should we forget about it and tell the > user to just fix the issue and reboot? I suspect it is best to tell users to just reboot, because those users able to recover without a reboo

Re: [Pkg-sysvinit-devel] installation-manual: Should it suggests to switch to run level 1 and back?

Petter Reinholdtsen, le Wed 17 Apr 2013 00:26:39 +0200, a écrit : > > 2. Should the installation manual be modified? > > Perhaps. :) Which way? Do you think we can still provide a recipe to manage to get the system booted, or should we forget about it and tell the user to just fix the issue and

Re: [Pkg-sysvinit-devel] installation-manual: Should it suggests to switch to run level 1 and back?

recommended to move all daemon starting out of rcS.d/ and into rc[2-5].d/. There is a lot of work left to do before this is done. Luckily there isn't that that many daemons started from rcS.d/, so in many installations, switching to runlevel 1 and back will work. > 2. Should the ins

installation-manual: Should it suggests to switch to run level 1 and back?

runlevel because it is very likely that they were not started. The easiest way to achieve this is by switching to the first runlevel and back by entering # init 1 at the shell prompt and pressing Control+D when asked for the root password. That qoutation doesn't fully

Bug#688650: debian-installer: Wrong IP added to interfaces config file if you go back to network setup menu

Package: debian-installer Version: 20110106+squeeze4+b1 Severity: normal During the install you setup the IP informatio manually, then if you go back to the network setup screen and change the IP information the install doesn't add the new IP to the interfaces file, instead it creates the

Bug#636211: marked as done (netcfg: "Enter the passphrase for WPA PSK" missing a "go back" button)

Your message dated Fri, 15 Jun 2012 06:02:31 + with message-id and subject line Bug#636211: fixed in netcfg 1.71 has caused the Debian Bug report #636211, regarding netcfg: "Enter the passphrase for WPA PSK" missing a "go back" button to be marked as done. This means tha

Processed: reassign 676001 back to initramfs-tools

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 676001 initramfs-tools Bug #676001 [busybox] initramfs-tools: busybox's switch_root doesn't handle /proc or /sys moving Bug reassigned from package 'busybox' to 'initramfs-tools'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #676001 t

reassign 676001 back to initramfs-tools

reassign 676001 initramfs-tools thanks Reassigning the bug back to initramfs-tools where it belongs according to my comments below and lack of any arguments to the opposite. With all my dislike to such a ping-pong. Thanks, /mjt On 05.06.2012 08:45, Michael Tokarev wrote: [] > I disagree it

Re: kfreebsd-* d-i autobuilding back again

Steven Chamberlain writes: > On 17/05/12 11:58, Christoph Egger wrote: >> The daily builds of d-i should now be back for both kfreebsd- >> architectures. > > Hi Christoph, > > Thanks a lot! I can start testing these again. > > Do you have any brief notes on what

Re: kfreebsd-* d-i autobuilding back again

On 17/05/12 11:58, Christoph Egger wrote: > The daily builds of d-i should now be back for both kfreebsd- > architectures. Hi Christoph, Thanks a lot! I can start testing these again. Do you have any brief notes on what things you had to set up for this? Or a link to some docs / Wik

kfreebsd-* d-i autobuilding back again

Hi all! The daily builds of d-i should now be back for both kfreebsd- architectures. d-i.debian.org currently has binaries from my testrun ~2h ago and should get feed by croned builds starting tonight. Regards Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian

Bug#636211: netcfg: "Enter the passphrase for WPA PSK" missing a "go back" button (Was: about bug #636211)

] but I can't reproduce the problem. When I looked at > the > source code there should be a back button. But for some reason it's not shown on the screen, that's where investigation is needed. > Maybe request is for going back to interface select menu when back > button is sel

Bug#636211: netcfg: "Enter the passphrase for WPA PSK" missing a "go back" button

f (missing feature). But the problem is that there is no "go back" button to go back to using e.g. eth0 instead of wlan0. Samuel -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 

Bug#453661: marked as done (auto-install: Falling back to the package description)

Your message dated Sun, 01 May 2011 18:42:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#624719: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #453661, regarding auto-install: Falling back to the package description to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#616315: cdebconf in d-i via serial hides the option to go back

Hi all, now i have created messages for systems that support 'go back' and conditions to deal with it. I tested the udebs installing on a kvm and i get a text mode installer with the 'go back' in the prompt. -- Melhores cumprimentos/Best regards, Miguel Figueiredo htt

Bug#616315: cdebconf in d-i via serial hides the option to go back

On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 11:00, Ferenc Wagner wrote: > Miguel Figueiredo writes: > >> New proposal for the messages. > > You still don't seem to handle the case when going back isn't > supported.  Is that entirely forbidden in the installer? Miguel, Take a lo

Bug#616315: cdebconf in d-i via serial hides the option to go back

Quoting Miguel Figueiredo (el...@debianpt.org): > New proposal for the messages. I ack'ed them on IRC. This mail just for the record. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#616315: cdebconf in d-i via serial hides the option to go back

Miguel Figueiredo writes: > New proposal for the messages. You still don't seem to handle the case when going back isn't supported. Is that entirely forbidden in the installer? -- Regards, Feri. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with

Bug#616315: cdebconf in d-i via serial hides the option to go back

conf/text-prompt-default Type: text # :sl4: -_Description: Prompt: '%c' for help, default=%d> +_Description: Prompt: '%c': help, '%c': go back, default: '%d'> Template: debconf/text-prompt Type: text # :sl4: -_Description: Prompt: '%c&

Bug#616315: cdebconf in d-i via serial hides the option to go back

Quoting Miguel Figueiredo (el...@debianpt.org): > > Prompt: '%c': help, '%c': go back, default: '%d'> > > Here it goes the patch with Christian's suggestion. There are a few inconsistencies in spaces: > -_Description: Prompt: '%c&#

Bug#616315: cdebconf in d-i via serial hides the option to go back

Hi, A Sexta 04 Março 2011 07:26:25 Christian PERRIER você escreveu: > Quoting Miguel Figueiredo (el...@debianpt.org): > > -_Description: Prompt: '%c' for help, default=%d> > > +_Description: Prompt: '%c' for help, '%c' go back, default=%d>

Bug#616315: cdebconf in d-i via serial hides the option to go back

Quoting Miguel Figueiredo (el...@debianpt.org): > -_Description: Prompt: '%c' for help, default=%d> > +_Description: Prompt: '%c' for help, '%c' go back, default=%d> The text could also be (shorter and imho more consistent): Prompt: '%c': he

Bug#616315: cdebconf in d-i via serial hides the option to go back

Miguel Figueiredo wrote: > In attachment a patch for cdebconf to be reviewed. Thanks for working on this. Since backup support can be disabled or enabled at various times, a fully correct patch would conditionalise the text on its status. That may not matter in the context of using cdebconf in d

Bug#616315: cdebconf in d-i via serial hides the option to go back

Hi, A Quinta 03 Março 2011 12:40:12 Ian Jackson você escreveu: > Package: cdebconf-text-udeb > Version: 0.154 > > When running the squeeze installer via a serial console there should > be something in the prompt to tell you that you can go back; you > shouldn't have to rea

Bug#616315: cdebconf in d-i via serial hides the option to go back

Package: cdebconf-text-udeb Version: 0.154 When running the squeeze installer via a serial console there should be something in the prompt to tell you that you can go back; you shouldn't have to read the help to know this. The help is very long and "go back" is an important option

Re: RFC: bringing back task packages

[Not sure whether we should keep the long To: - list, I'd suggest continuing on debian-devel but keep it for the moment.] On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 07:20:30PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > A long time ago, tasksel installed task packages, which were regular > metapackages. This was dropped because the

Re: RFC: bringing back task packages

Le jeudi 17 février 2011 à 19:20 -0400, Joey Hess a écrit : > ### gnome > > Would the gnome team want to maintain a task-gnome? > Much of tasksel's gnome task is already taken from the gnome-core > and gnome metapackages, with a few more things added. Yes, they fit globally the same purpose. Th

Re: RFC: bringing back task packages

Quoting Joey Hess (jo...@debian.org): > ### i18n > > There are many language tasks in tasksel. It might be good to have > the task packages be moved out of tasksel; I don't know if it'd make > sense to have individual language teams maintain them, or what. Many teams are definitely too small to

RFC: bringing back task packages

A long time ago, tasksel installed task packages, which were regular metapackages. This was dropped because the task packages had to Depend on many packages, which made the installed system brittle, and made testing propigation a problem. Now that Recommends are installed by default, I'm revisitin

Bug#518808: marked as done (installation-guide: Put back booting from DOS section)

Your message dated Mon, 24 Jan 2011 12:17:52 + with message-id and subject line Bug#518808: fixed in installation-guide 20110122 has caused the Debian Bug report #518808, regarding installation-guide: Put back booting from DOS section to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#606242: Reproduces on multiple machines with multiple type mice, on at least two screen button icons; [Go Back] and [Continue].

hine: Motherboard: A bit KT7, Raid, 1 Ghz. Processor: AMD AThlon K7, 850 Mhz, Socket 'A' Memory: SDRAM 2 x 512Mb = 1Gb. Chipset: Via KT 133 ATX, USB 1.0 compliant, UDMA 100, Socket 'A', FSB 200Mhz, AGP 4X. (Further details of this machine are already reported previously above.) Com

Processed: same problem is back due to changes in d-i, reopening

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > unarchive 603974 Bug #603974 {Done: Daniel Baumann } [live-installer] needs to reconfigure console-setup Unarchived Bug 603974 > reopen 603974 Bug #603974 {Done: Daniel Baumann } [live-installer] needs to reconfigure console-setup 'reopen' may b

Bug#510422: marked as done (tasksel: Schould switch back to xdm for XFCE and maybe also for LXDE tasks)

Your message dated Mon, 6 Dec 2010 14:26:33 -0400 with message-id <20101206182633.ga19...@gnu.kitenet.net> and subject line xdm for xfce has caused the Debian Bug report #510422, regarding tasksel: Schould switch back to xdm for XFCE and maybe also for LXDE tasks to be marked as done. This

Bug#600428: trouble going back and forth in installation steps

Hi, you used a Debian 'Lenny' cd image, although there's nothing wrong with that we are near the release of Debian 'Squeeze' and we are trying to identify/fix bugs for this release. Care to try with the latest cd images and report if you encounter any/same problems? http://cdimage.debian.org/c

Bug#600428: trouble going back and forth in installation steps

it, I went back to menu and entered Partition hard drives again to look it up, that's when trouble commenced: when I went back to the menu, I couldn't re-enter installing the boot loader and was kicked back to partitioning hard drives, when I finally chose to re-write the partition table in

Bug#513253: marked as done (debian-installer: won't boot; kernel reboots back into bootloader)

Your message dated Sat, 11 Sep 2010 15:25:32 + with message-id and subject line Closing oldbug report against debian-installer #513253 has caused the Debian Bug report #513253, regarding debian-installer: won't boot; kernel reboots back into bootloader to be marked as done. This means

Bug#297001: marked as done (Instaalation screen becomes scrumbled after switching to another VC and back)

Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:57:54 + with message-id and subject line Closing old installation report #297001 has caused the Debian Bug report #297001, regarding Instaalation screen becomes scrumbled after switching to another VC and back to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#584752: debian-installer: "GO BACK" not working if harddisk mounted

Package: debian-installer Version: "GO BACK" not working if harddisk mounted Severity: minor Dear Sir, I mounted the usb pendrive for the ip2100 fw that it asked during installation of hte debian testing i386. OK I get to the harddisk setup, and make my disks as I desired. But th

Back

I'm back from 4 days away without mail access. I just catched up with the list without really reading it. In case something important needing my attention happened since Saturday evening, please mail me privately. -- signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Processed: Re: Bug#570755: installation-reports: Continue & Back buttons switched on "archive not found screen"

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 570755 choose-mirror Bug #570755 [installation-reports] installation-reports: Continue & Back buttons switched on "archive not found screen" Bug reassigned from package 'installation-reports' to 'c

Bug#570755: marked as done (installation-reports: Continue & Back buttons switched on "archive not found screen")

Your message dated Sun, 21 Feb 2010 11:34:35 +0100 with message-id <201002211134.36315.elen...@planet.nl> and subject line Re: Bug#570755: installation-reports: Continue & Back buttons switched on "archive not found screen" has caused the Debian Bug report #570755, regarding

Bug#570755: installation-reports: Continue & Back buttons switched on "archive not found screen"

reported one. Hence at the stage when download locations are added to apt.conf the installer reported a failure (please note that I did the install in German and roughly translated all strings back): [!!] Configuring the package manager Invalid archive mirror After the explantion (which I did not

Bug#546983: console-setup-mini: fails to set the keyboard layout (and falls back to "us" layout)

On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:32:25 +0200 Anton Zinoviev wrote: > On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 12:47:41AM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: > > > > > Where can I find a list of the symbols that the fonts in console-setup > > > need to support? > > > > As far as the toilet "future" font is concerned, you may wis

  1   2   3   4   >