Your message dated Fri, 28 Feb 2014 22:26:04 +0100
with message-id <20140228212604.ga7...@mraw.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#594461: apt-setup: Should propose using t-p-u when
testing is installed
has caused the Debian Bug report #594461,
regarding apt-setup: Should propose using t-p-
Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Well, after thinking a little bit more, I wonder if the case of users
> installing testing *and then* wanting to track stable is really what
> we want to address here. And I also wonder whether that happens often
> (that someone installs testing and then sticks to stable
Quoting Gaudenz Steinlin (gaud...@debian.org):
> What's the rationale for adding t-p-u? IMO t-p-u is quite different
That came from a remark by Russ Albery who mentioned that t-p-u
packages do not receive enough testing to imagine that, during
freezes, maintainers are more encouraged to use unst
Excerpts from Christian PERRIER's message of Fre Aug 27 06:56:44 +0200 2010:
> Quoting Joey Hess (jo...@debian.org):
> > Does it really make sense for users to use t-p-u? Anything can be
> > uploaded there, rejected by the release team, and no upgrade path is
> > necessarily provided for a system
Quoting Joey Hess (jo...@debian.org):
> Does it really make sense for users to use t-p-u? Anything can be
> uploaded there, rejected by the release team, and no upgrade path is
> necessarily provided for a system that installed a package from there
> and ends up tracking stable.
Well, after think
Hello,
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Joey Hess wrote:
> Does it really make sense for users to use t-p-u? Anything can be
> uploaded there, rejected by the release team, and no upgrade path is
> necessarily provided for a system that installed a package from there
> and ends up tracking stab
Does it really make sense for users to use t-p-u? Anything can be
uploaded there, rejected by the release team, and no upgrade path is
necessarily provided for a system that installed a package from there
and ends up tracking stable.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 10:03:40AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Christian PERRIER]
> > After a (short) discussion in -devel, I came up with the proposal of
> > activating "testing-proposed-updates" when users install testing, in
> > a similar way that we currently propose activating volati
[Christian PERRIER]
> After a (short) discussion in -devel, I came up with the proposal of
> activating "testing-proposed-updates" when users install testing, in
> a similar way that we currently propose activating volatile when
> they install stable.
One challenge that should be considered, is w
Package: apt-setup
Severity: wishlist
After a (short) discussion in -devel, I came up with the proposal of
activating "testing-proposed-updates" when users install testing, in a
similar way that we currently propose activating volatile when they
install stable.
So, sending this as a bug report ag
10 matches
Mail list logo
