* Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> Are these libraries different (different ABI/API) from the ones in
> libdirectfb-0.9-16? If they are, I'm interesting in why they are
> different, and how they are different. If they are identical, you
> probably should use the same file names and sonames for the
>
[Sebastian Ley]
> I have been working on that issue, and made some progress. But every
> little progress pops up more problems, so I would be glad if some
> library experts can give me some advice.
>
> This is what I have done for directfb (should be a generic issue for
> libaries that use other
* Michael Cardenas wrote:
> Akira, Your udebs look great, but since the last time I talked to you,
> we discussed some more of the details here on the list with Sebastian
> Lay and Junichi, and came up with the following plan:
>
> It seems that for udebs with libraries, we need to have the
> fol
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 12:32:10PM +0900, Akira TAGOH wrote:
> > On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 08:39:24 -0800,
> > "MC" == Michael Cardenas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> MC> Yes, the udeb should have the package name libpango1.0-0-udeb, if it
> MC> doesn't already.
>
> MC> You're talking about th
4 matches
Mail list logo
