Re: YA b-f report

2001-07-12 Thread Ethan Benson
On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 11:47:28PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Ethan Benson wrote: > > its of course rather pointless for woody but when woody becomes stable > > it will become correct. > > It's quite possible that some old and seldom released packages will have > a security fix done by the securit

Re: YA b-f report

2001-07-11 Thread Joey Hess
Ethan Benson wrote: > its of course rather pointless for woody but when woody becomes stable > it will become correct. It's quite possible that some old and seldom released packages will have a security fix done by the security team that will hit the security archive before a fix hits stable, and

Re: YA b-f report

2001-07-10 Thread Ethan Benson
On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 11:02:00PM -0400, Russell Hires wrote: > This time I'm up to date a little bit with what's going on! B-F 3.0.7, which > Ethan uploaded over the weekend I finally got to do something with... > > It went pretty well, actually. I'm still confused about the security updates

Re: YA b-f report

2001-07-10 Thread Joey Hess
Russell Hires wrote: > It went pretty well, actually. I'm still confused about the security updates > part of one of the dialogs. It goes after potato stuff, rather than woody. I > guess this will change when woody become official? There is no security site for testing or unstable, so it adds

YA b-f report

2001-07-10 Thread Russell Hires
This time I'm up to date a little bit with what's going on! B-F 3.0.7, which Ethan uploaded over the weekend I finally got to do something with... It went pretty well, actually. I'm still confused about the security updates part of one of the dialogs. It goes after potato stuff, rather than woo