Rob Bradford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit:
> > Please think of us for a moment before submitting such patches (and
> > reformatting large paragraphs after deleting a word). I am sure that
> > robster had all the best intentions and were not at all aware of this
> > side effect when s
> Please think of us for a moment before submitting such patches (and
> reformatting large paragraphs after deleting a word). I am sure that
> robster had all the best intentions and were not at all aware of this
> side effect when submitting the patch. Of course the SGML source should
> not be al
> Well, I'm not sure it makes sense for translators to follow re-filling
> of text, since word lengths are not consistent. Why not just use
> 'diff -b'? Or is there something I'm missing?
Agreed, it does not make sence at all to obey the original line wraps.
Thanks for the tip. I tried inserti
On Sun, 2002-03-03 at 13:50, Claus Hindsgaul wrote:
> Please think of us for a moment before submitting such patches (and
> reformatting large paragraphs after deleting a word). I am sure that
> robster had all the best intentions and were not at all aware of this
> side effect when submitting the
On Sun, 2002-03-03 at 18:50, Claus Hindsgaul wrote:
> - Debian 3.0 is much more secure that previous releases.
Looks like that that is a typo.
p.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Just a sigh from a translator of the b-f documentation...
The release-notes.SGML CVS version 1.86 was another beautification of
the SGML code:"Fixed some formatting problems that seemed to have
creeped in." by robster. The same happened some time back in January.
E.g. paragraphs were indent
6 matches
Mail list logo
