Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:06 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #338695
has caused the Debian Bug report #338695,
regarding [sparc] Ultra 5 installation report - etch beta1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:57:56 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #302068
has caused the Debian Bug report #302068,
regarding Installation works fine on Sun Ultra 5 (sparc - sun4u)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:57:53 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #293967
has caused the Debian Bug report #293967,
regarding sparc ultra 5 install success with half ram
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:57:53 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #293966
has caused the Debian Bug report #293966,
regarding sparc ultra 5 install failure
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:57:38 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #271477
has caused the Debian Bug report #271477,
regarding Install report: rc1 on an Ultra 5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
Your message dated Fri, 13 Oct 2006 13:11:07 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#392746: installation-reports: Install ok on Sun Ultra 5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If t
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: CD
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/sparc/iso-cd/debian-testing-sparc-binary-1.iso
Image of the 10/10/06
Date: 12 october 2006, at about 20:45
Machine: Sun UltraSparc 5
Partitions:
BasystemTypeSize U
>From #305230 I did learn that newer Sparcs like Ultra 5
also need continues memory (no "gaps" allowed).
So please keep the memory section in the documentation.
Cheers
Geert Stappers
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5
> reassign 264585 debian-installer-manual
Bug#264585: Sparc rc1 cdrom installation on Ultra 5
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `debian-installer-manual&#
TED]>; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 10:56:54 +
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 10:56:54 +
From: Philip Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Sparc installation fails on Ultra 5
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Conte
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: rc1
uname -a: Linux sparc 2.4.26-sparc64 #1 Sun Jun 20 02:39:17 PDT 2004 sparc64 GNU/Linux
Date: Mon Sep 13 20:52:45 EST 2004
Method: netinst CD, via serial console
Machine: Sun Ultra5
Processor: UltraSPARC II
Memory: 128M
Ro
, 2004
Method: Booting from CD burned with image listed above.
Machine: Sun Ultra 5/10 UPA/PCI
Processor: UltraSPARC-IIi 333MHz
Memory: 128 MB
Root Device: IDE
Root Size/partition table:
Disk /dev/hda (Sun disk label): 16 heads, 63 sectors, 17662 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 1008 * 512 bytes
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 05:53:51PM +1000, Vincent McIntyre wrote:
> > Is this limitation mentioned in the Sarge Sparc install manual
> > anywhere? I couldn't find it on a cursory scan.
> >
> there are a few threads about this on www.sunmanagers.org, eg
> http://sunportal.sunmanagers.org/pipermail/s
> Is this limitation mentioned in the Sarge Sparc install manual
> anywhere? I couldn't find it on a cursory scan.
>
there are a few threads about this on www.sunmanagers.org, eg
http://sunportal.sunmanagers.org/pipermail/summaries/2001-September/70.html
this might be of use to the documenters
On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 11:21:43AM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
> >Is there a disk size limit for the IDE controller on the Ultra 5?
>
> Yes, the ide ccontroler does not support disks more than 130gB. Early
> solaris versions o
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
>OK. Tried again with a different (smaller) disk, and the reboot worked
>this time.
>
>So a completely successful install on an Ultra 5 from start to finish.
>
>Is there a disk size limit for the IDE controller on the Ultra
OK. Tried again with a different (smaller) disk, and the reboot worked
this time.
So a completely successful install on an Ultra 5 from start to finish.
Is there a disk size limit for the IDE controller on the Ultra 5?
Phil
--
http://www.kantaka.co.uk/ .oOo. public key: http
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: RC1 from http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
uname -a:
Date: Mon Aug 9 14:20:26 BST 2004
Method: businesscard CDROM
Machine: Sun Ultra 5
Processor: 360Mhz UltraSPARC IIi
Memory: 512 Mb
Root Device: 41Gb IDE hard drive, /dev/hda
On Sat, May 22, 2004 at 09:04:28AM -0300, Joey Hess wrote:
> Geert Stappers AT tw89 wrote:
> > It was a netboot install,
> > the CD detect complained that there was no CD-ROM,
> > I had to acknowledge the "error"..
> >
> >
> > After all a succesfull installation.
>
> cdrom-detect is optional pri
Geert Stappers AT tw89 wrote:
> It was a netboot install,
> the CD detect complained that there was no CD-ROM,
> I had to acknowledge the "error"..
>
>
> After all a succesfull installation.
cdrom-detect is optional priority so anna should not load it during a
network install. Do you have the lo
, 22 May 2004 08:28:12 +0200
Method: network install, "boot net", http://ftp.nl.debian.org, not
proxied
Machine: Sun Ultra 5
Processor: Ultra Sparc 275Mhz
Memory: 128Mb
Root Device: IDE
Root Size/partition table:
Disk /dev/hda (Sun disk label): 15 heads, 63 sectors, 8894 cylinders
Units =
l boots
Hard reset / power on -> boot solaris -> halt solaris -> boot cdrom ->
illegal instruction after initrd loading.
However, after booting the kernel, it is then unable to find a root
filesystem, so the install halts at this point.
This is one of the evil Ultra 5 IDE based Sun box
On 0, Aravind Vinnakota <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all!
> I just started using Debian. I am trying to install debian on Sun Ultra
> 5 machine. I tried 3 different ways to install it but could'nt:
>
> 1) I downloaded the CD images. I tried to burn it on CDs b
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 09:25:57PM -0400, Aravind Vinnakota wrote:
> Hi all!
> I just started using Debian. I am trying to install debian on Sun Ultra
> 5 machine. I tried 3 different ways to install it but could'nt:
>
> 1) I downloaded the CD images. I tried to burn it o
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 09:25:57PM -0400, Aravind Vinnakota wrote:
> Hi all!
> I just started using Debian. I am trying to install debian on Sun Ultra
> 5 machine. I tried 3 different ways to install it but could'nt:
>
> 1) I downloaded the CD images. I tried to burn it o
Hi all!
I just started using Debian. I am trying to install debian on Sun Ultra
5 machine. I tried 3 different ways to install it but could'nt:
1) I downloaded the CD images. I tried to burn it on CDs but the images
seem to be larger than the CD size. So, I could'nt burn the CDs.
26 matches
Mail list logo
