As a result of this discussion, I've submitted requests to BTS asking
debootstrap to stop installing modconf (#232673), lilo (#232667) and
mbr (#232672), and added a patch to the bug asking for syslinux to be
dropped as well (#205379).
Hopefully the maintainer upload a new version soon. :)
--
[Petter Reinholdtsen]
> Installing worked just fine, both commands worked just fine:
>
> debootstrap sarge chroot-sarge-debootstrap http://ftp.skolelinux.no/debian
> cdebootstrap sarge chroot-sarge-cdebootstrap http://ftp.skolelinux.no/debian
I decided it was a good idea to compare the Woody in
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> Why is slang1 installed?
Possibly because tasksel used to link to it.
> Why are both ipchains and iptables installed?
Not sure, maybe bug #134478 would say, but I'm offline.
> Why is gettext-base installed if nothing depend on it?
base-config uses it for i18n.
> W
Bastian Blank wrote:
> I'm going to change the behavior for standard and installer bootstraps
> to install complete required. Minimal and (build-)chroot installs or not
> affected.
Good.
> > I have never seen the point of the mbr package, but whatever. ;-)
>
> Standard i386 mbr which jumps into
On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 04:12:08PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 03:02:52PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > I'd be very surprised to encounter a Unix system without vi.
>
> vi-clone.
Yeah, whatever, near enough.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROT
On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 03:02:52PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> I'd be very surprised to encounter a Unix system without vi.
vi-clone.
Bastian
--
One does not thank logic.
-- Sarek, "Journey to Babel", stardate 3842.4
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 03:18:27PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> nvi standard, installer do we need that or should nano supperseed it?
I'd be very surprised to encounter a Unix system without vi.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
On Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 05:04:50PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Several of the packages in the above list are Priority required, and
> I feel they should not be removed from the debian base system while they
> have that priority, as our documentation documents Required packages as
> packages whose rem
[Petter Reinholdtsen]
> The following 55 packages was not installed by cdebootstrap, but
> installed by debootstrap:
As a check, I installed deborphan in the debootstrap chroot, and
looked at the output from 'deborphan -a', to find out which packages
in the chroot that nothing depend on. This is
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> The following 55 packages was not installed by cdebootstrap, but
> installed by debootstrap:
>
> apt-utils at bsdmainutils cpio cron dhcp-client ed exim4 exim4-base
> exim4-config exim4-daemon-l fdutils gcc-3.2-base gettext-base
> groff-base ifupdown info ipchain
On Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 10:19:49PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> apt-utils at bsdmainutils cpio cron dhcp-client ed exim4 exim4-base
> exim4-config exim4-daemon-l fdutils gcc-3.2-base gettext-base
> groff-base ifupdown info ipchains iptables libdb2 libgcrypt1
> libgcrypt7 libgdbm3 lib
The cdeboostrap package seem to improve, and might soon be a useful
replacement for debootstrap in d-i. Because of this, I decided it was
time to test it a bit more. Luckily it is already in sid, so t was
only one 'apt-get install cdebootstrap' away. :)
Installing worked just fine, both command
12 matches
Mail list logo
