Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sunday 22 June 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> +++ b/packages/kernel/kernel-wedge/modules/nic-extra-modules
>> +enc28j60
>> +igb
>> +r6040
>
> Did you do a test build for all arches with these? There will be failures
> if not all of them support this.
Y
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 06:18:46PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> ide-generic did hurt a lot, it took over the ide device in various case
> over the native driver, and disk support broke.
Which cases? lack of ide-generic hurts a lot when it is the only driver
for your controller too.
> Also, this i
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 06:49:32PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> this thread goes no where.
>
> loading a module on *all* boxes for 0.01% percent of the population
> is not the right thing to do.
And what solution is there for the 0.01% that would like to continue
using their systems? Do you
this thread goes no where.
loading a module on *all* boxes for 0.01% percent of the population
is not the right thing to do.
if you want some more informed statement read what fjp wrote down
or come up with a fine patch.
--
mask
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 05:21:34PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> that there is *zero* point in having it loaded first.
>
> also win 95 killed ISA thankfully. gone dead.
> if someone really complains we can start wasting time there.
Win95 ran just fine on an ISA only 486. Not dead what so eve
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 11:16:23AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 03:42:55AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > On Mon, 23 Jun 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > > Kernel Team, please give us some guidance on that. Should we use
> > > ide-generic-pci or ide-generic?
> >
>
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 03:42:55AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jun 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > Kernel Team, please give us some guidance on that. Should we use
> > ide-generic-pci or ide-generic?
>
> on my TODO, currently fjp has the best write up on the current situation.
>
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Sunday 22 June 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> >> I've prepared a set of patches against current kernel-wedge to update
> >> it.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >> - ide-generic-pci
> >>
> >> I haven't add it si
On Sunday 22 June 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> +++ b/packages/kernel/kernel-wedge/modules/nic-extra-modules
> +enc28j60
> +igb
> +r6040
Did you do a test build for all arches with these? There will be failures
if not all of them support this.
See also my reply today to Martin's inventory mail.
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sunday 22 June 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> I've prepared a set of patches against current kernel-wedge to update
>> it.
>
> Thanks.
>
>> - ide-generic-pci
>>
>> I haven't add it since I found no reference about it being used by
>> other distros
On Sunday 22 June 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> I've prepared a set of patches against current kernel-wedge to update
> it.
Thanks.
> - ide-generic-pci
>
> I haven't add it since I found no reference about it being used by
> other distros and then I prefer to still use ide-generic for now
Hello,
I've prepared a set of patches against current kernel-wedge to update
it. Comments bellow:
- ide-generic-pci
I haven't add it since I found no reference about it being used by
other distros and then I prefer to still use ide-generic for now,
so near of release
- virtio_bkl, xe
I'm extremely disappointed that we've not yet been able to switch D-I over
to 2.6.25, but the plain fact is that the needed work is just not being
done.
The basic problem seems to be that we don't have a maintainer for
kernel-wedge. Joey has done that job up to 2.6.22 with occasional
contribut
On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 01:04 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Wednesday 28 May 2008, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 02:14 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > Now seems like a good time to remind you that I would like to add
> > -686-bigmem kernel udebs to the mix to support running D-I under PAE
On Wednesday 28 May 2008, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 02:14 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> Now seems like a good time to remind you that I would like to add
> -686-bigmem kernel udebs to the mix to support running D-I under PAE
> Xen.
I don't see any real objection to adding only a netb
On Wednesday 28 May 2008, Frans Pop wrote:
> If there are no comments I'll commit in about 2 days.
After acks from Otavio, Joey and Max I have committed my changes.
This means that now porters can start checking for changes in modules. As I
said in the last mail, I'm going to leave that to other
On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 02:14 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> Today I have done the initial work to prepare the switch to 2.6.25 for D-I.
Now seems like a good time to remind you that I would like to add
-686-bigmem kernel udebs to the mix to support running D-I under PAE
Xen.
http://lists.debian.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Please comment based on my git log entries below. If anyone wants to review
> the actual patches before they are committed I can provide them.
> If there are no comments I'll commit in about 2 days.
First I'd
On Wednesday 28 May 2008, you wrote:
> The first two changes below are minor: modules made optional because they
> are no longer available.
Damn. Knew I was missing something. There was another dropped module.
> Overview of changes
> ===
0. irda-modules: irport module is no lon
Today I have done the initial work to prepare the switch to 2.6.25 for D-I.
Note that I have done no checks at all for new/removed/changed modules, not
even for i386/amd64! I'll leave that to others.
What I have done is only the structural changes required to build using
basically the cu
20 matches
Mail list logo
