On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 08:48:47PM +0100, Holger Wansing wrote:
> The situation for the d-i manual is similar: we have some languages,
> that did not receive no or nearly no translation updates since the
> release of Wheezy.
> Should those languages be deactivated?
> These are:japanese (no up
Hi,
Christian PERRIER (2015-03-05):
> No, no call for translations.
>
> I actually rely on translators who want D-I to be fully translated
> to follow its status through the status pages
> (http://d-i.debian.org/l10n-stats/)
>
> It means that we're indeed left with about only 10 languages that
Hi all,
and sorry for the lag in replying to this thread.
A quick word about Danish, re-enabled in:
69659 sthibault daDanish
(according to svn blame debian/langlist).
Hendrik Boom (2015-03-12):
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 08:48:47PM +0100, Holger Wansing wrote:
> > The situation for the d-
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 08:48:47PM +0100, Holger Wansing wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Christian PERRIER wrote:
> > It means that we're indeed left with about only 10 languages that
> > happen to be complete -> those where translators act on their own and
> > know what to do to get a fully translated D-I.
> >
Hi,
Christian PERRIER wrote:
> It means that we're indeed left with about only 10 languages that
> happen to be complete -> those where translators act on their own and
> know what to do to get a fully translated D-I.
>
> For others, most of the time, the registered person with commit access
> e
> Thanks for your work on console-setup. Was a call for translations
> issued? It seems git only has a very tiny number of updated
> translations:
No, no call for translations.
I actually rely on translators who want D-I to be fully translated to
follow its status through the status pages
(http
6 matches
Mail list logo
