On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 08:40:34PM +, Chuan-kai Lin wrote:
[...]
> A more interesting question would be asking them if they consider the
> country names listed in ISO 3166 also part of the standard. If they
> respond that the country names are only used to make it clear to which
> country/regi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Michlmayr - Debian Project Leader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I unfortunately missed Christian on Friday by a few hours, but I will
> comment on the draft he sent to me and make sure it's ready when he
> returns from his holidays.
I can guess
* Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-16 07:18]:
> I proposed this mail to Martin Michlmayr as it is written in the name
> of the Debian Project, not in my own name (I don't expect an answer if
> I just send a mail as an individual).
>
> Martin is of course busy, so I don't expect an an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quoting Denis Barbier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>> the names which are best suited for their needs. (But changing
>> this language name is not that easy and will take several days)
>> So Christian, take some r
On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 03:11:30PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Denis Barbier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > In the meantime, are you going to replace galician by galleghan in
> > languagelist to follow ISO 639? This would be logical, and make more
>
> Well, sounds logical to me, yes.
>
Quoting Denis Barbier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> In the meantime, are you going to replace galician by galleghan in
> languagelist to follow ISO 639? This would be logical, and make more
Well, sounds logical to me, yes.
This just needs someone reporting the bug to iso-codes.I'm not the
maintain
On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 07:18:21AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Anton Zinoviev ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > 4. ISO 3166 is not politically independent standard. Moreover it has
>
> *This* is a political statement..:-)
>
> On this topic, I have started writing a formal mail to the ISO
On 16.IV.2004 07:18 (+0200) Christian Perrier wrote:
>
> > 4. ISO 3166 is not politically independent standard. Moreover it has
>
> *This* is a political statement..:-)
I agree.
> Getting an official answer from ISO-3166 would at least help us
> in deciding whether this standard body is or isn
Quoting Anton Zinoviev ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> 4. ISO 3166 is not politically independent standard. Moreover it has
*This* is a political statement..:-)
On this topic, I have started writing a formal mail to the ISO-3166
secretary asking about an official statement from ISO-3166 about their
use
On 15.IV.2004 at 08:08 (+0200) Christian Perrier wrote:
>
> However, I take this occasion to highlight something which seems
> misunderstood here : I, myself, Christian Perrier, am absolutely NOT
> in position of changing anything on my own decision.
Then probably we can use a General Resolution?
Quoting Denis Barbier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> the names which are best suited for their needs. (But changing
> this language name is not that easy and will take several days)
> So Christian, take some rest without net access and when you are back
> we will see if you change your mind about this is
On Wed, Apr 14, 2004 at 10:39:29PM +, Chuan-kai Lin wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As Martin wrote privately to me about this issue (I guess I could
> > quote him completely about this but I didn't receive his expli
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As Martin wrote privately to me about this issue (I guess I could
> quote him completely about this but I didn't receive his explicit
> permission for that), we are not in the business of deciding which
>
13 matches
Mail list logo
