Quoting Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl):
> I also don't think it's a big problem as the review will get done
> eventually. This current focus on getting the spam cleaned out within the
> shortest time possible is unnecessary. d-boot is already by far the
> cleanest list in the archives.
The main
On Sunday 01 August 2010, Lee Winter wrote:
> > It means that we probably need a few more DD's to look at signalled
> > spam for the debian-boot mailing list through
>
> I disagree. I believe the above fact indicates that we need a better
> communication mechanism for reviewers, rather than more i
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 7:00 AM, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> We're now in August, so it's time for our team of magic reviewers to
> work on July 2010 archives.
>
> More details on http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/SpamClean
>
> Note that, out of about 20-25 spams identified for June
> month, on
We're now in August, so it's time for our team of magic reviewers to
work on July 2010 archives.
More details on http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/SpamClean
Note that, out of about 20-25 spams identified for June
month, only 5 have been finally removed from the archive.
It means that we pro
4 matches
Mail list logo
